Beyond Ridiculous

I wrote a post last night about McCain’s obnoxious habit of using his status as a POW to evade every scrap of criticism and create himself as some kind of astonishing expert in, well, everything. I figured I’d wait until the inevitable next time he trots out the POW pony to post it.

I underestimated his crassness. I figured it’d take him several days. It didn’t:

The initial response from the McCain campaign on the senator’s confusion about how many homes he owns was pretty weak. Put it this way, it talked about arugula and Hawaii.

A couple of hours later, though, the McCain gang went with the one response that applies to every question.

The McCain campaign is road-testing a new argument in responding to Obama’s criticism of his number-of-houses gaffe, an approach the McCain camp has never tried before: The houses gaffe doesn’t matter because … he was a P.O.W.!

“This is a guy who lived in one house for five and a half years — in prison,” spokesman Brian Rogers told the Washington Post.

I see. When the Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, a close Bush ally, publicly questioned McCain’s marital infidelities, the McCain campaign responded by highlighting McCain’s background as a prisoner of war.

When Dems attacked McCain’s healthcare plan in May, McCain responded by noting his background as a prisoner of war.

Asked by a local reporter about the first thing that comes to his mind when he thinks of Pittsburgh, McCain responded by talking about his background as a prisoner of war.

Accused of possibly having heard the questions in advance of Rick Warren’s recent candidate forum, the McCain campaign responded by highlighting McCain’s background as a prisoner of war.

There seems to be a pattern here.

There is indeed. It’s gotten pathological, and it’s infuriating, and it’s time for it to stop. There’s a fine line between informing and exploiting. McCain’s so deep into exploitation territory he can’t even see the line now.

Giuliani had 9-11 Tourette’s. McCain’s got the same thing with POW. I just hope the similarities won’t end there.

I’ll be posting my smackdown on Monday. Why start the weekend with a quick shot of outrage when we can save it for the long, slow burn? I’m sure he’ll have ridden the POW pony to the well of excuses a few more times by then, so the piece will still be topical.

Beyond Ridiculous
{advertisement}

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

Well, well. Looks like the fox shall be guarding the henhouse:

Hans von Spakovsky, as a top political appointee in Bush’s Justice Department, was a leading player in what has been labeled the administration’s “vote-suppression agenda.”

When it came to voter disenfranchisement, von Spakovsky was a reliable member of Team Bush. And as a reward, Bush tried to promote von Spakovsky to a six-year term on the Federal Election Commission, which touched off a major fight with Senate Democrats, and in turn, effectively shut down the FEC for months.

In May, Dems won when Spakovsky withdrew from consideration. In August, Americans lost, as Spakovsky was hired as a “consultant” to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

If Spakovsky’s history of backing efforts to make voting more difficult strikes you as a poor fit with the Commission’s mission of defending voter rights, consider that of the eight current commissioners at the agency, only two are registered Democrats, a politicization that the New York Times Charlie Savage brought to light last year.

Among Spakovsky’s duties will be overseeing the USCCR’s report on the Justice Department’s monitoring of the 2008 presidential elections, a source inside the USCCR told TPMmuckraker.

Spakovsky’s hiring is at the request of Commissioner Todd Gaziano, who works for the conservative Heritage Foundation on FEC issues and has defended Spakovsky in the press before. According to a federal government source, Gaziano has recommended Spakovsky at the government’s highest payscale — which would work out to about $124,010 annually if Spakovsky was to stay for an entire year.


This is crazy. The guy who was accused of voter-suppression tactics has no business “helping” monitor to the elections on behalf of the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

Crazy, indeed. I think this speaks volumes about how Republicons plan to win the election this November. Stay sharp, and have the number to your local elections commission handy.

McCain’s running for Bush’s third term in all but name. Now, he’s not even bothering to deny it:

John McCain has struggled for a long while to explain the ways in which he’s different from George W. Bush. He wasn’t asked the question much during the Republican primaries, but in recent months, it’s been an awkward subject for him.

For a while, McCain would tell anyone who asked about the differences that he disagrees with Bush on pork-barrel spending. Then he’d argue that McCain takes global warming more seriously than Bush does.

Now, he’s decided to hardly answer the question at all, telling the Politico, “I don’t have any need to show that I’m different than President Bush.”

Actually, in an environment in which voters are desperate for some kind of change in how the government operates, McCain absolutely needs to show how he’s different from Bush. If he’s not going to try, I’m delighted to hear it.


Well, I refer you to the previous entry to decide whether McCain feels any pressing need to campaign effectively, or whether he’s counting on good ol’ Republicon dirty tricks to win him the election.

Dirty tricks – and racism. Limbaugh continues pushing the meme today, no longer ashamed of being an open racist:

Continuing his race-based attacks from the day before, Rush Limbaugh declared yesterday that Sen. Barack Obama’s (D-IL) success so far is because people “can’t criticize the little black man-child:”

LIMBAUGH: It’s — you know, it’s just — it’s just we can’t hit the girl. I don’t care how far feminism’s saying, you can’t hit the girl, and you can’t — you can’t criticize the little black man-child. You just can’t do it, ’cause it’s just not right. It’s not fair. He’s such a victim.

I used to think we lived in a country where vile, openly racist statements such as these could only be made by rabidly insane assclowns on the outermost fringes of our society. I believed that anyone making statements like this on a fucking radio show broadcast nationwide would find his career handed to him with a stake through it. I think we all remember what happened to Don Imus for that “nappy-headed hos” debacle.

So why the fuck is Rush Limbaugh still on the air?
Has America fallen that far since last year?

It’s not like the media’s going to call him out on this. The media’s too shit-scared of the rabid right, and besides, they’re too busy defending their good barbecue buddy McCain:

During a townhall meeting yesterday, an audience member asked a long-winded question that ended with a call to enact the military draft in order to “chase bin Laden to the gates of Hell.” McCain immediately replied, “I don’t disagree with anything you said.”

Brushing off his instant response, some journalists are refusing to take McCain’s statement at face value. “Does McCain favor a draft? Nope,” the Atlantic’s Marc Ambinder wrote on his blog yesterday, deriding liberals for “having a conniption.” When asked about the quote last night on Countdown with Keith Olbermann, NBC Political Director Chuck Todd declared he was going to “give McCain the benefit of the doubt,” unbelievably claiming McCain was simply advocating some form of national service:

TODD: Let me just go there and give McCain the benefit of the doubt as to what he might have thought he was agreeing to. Which is that he has been a big advocate on the national service front, as has Obama, as sort of mandatory service in some form, that you see a lot of politicians take. So it is possible that that’s what he was talking about.

No. It wasn’t. And as many have pointed out, there’s no other way for McCain to have the wars he wants than to reinstate the draft. He wants us all serving in the military. He wants this country to become nothing more than a war machine.

He wants war, we should give him war. It’s time to start an all-out offensive. We need to find a way to make sure that the world knows what a disaster McCain would be.

Happy Hour Discurso

Break Out the Bubbly

Sometimes, good people really do get the recognition they deserve.

First up, one of my favorite bloggers of all time, Steve Benen of The Carpetbagger Report, got snapped up by the Washington Monthly:

Now that my friend Kevin Drum has made the announcement, I can pass along the big news.

Starting this Friday, Aug. 22, Kevin will be leaving the Washington Monthly, heading over to a new blog at Mother Jones. He’ll be replaced at Political Animal by … me.

Yes, five-and-a-half years and more than 16,000 posts later, I’m giving up The Carpetbagger Report to blog exclusively for the Washington Monthly. I couldn’t be more excited about the opportunity.

For years, I had this idea in mind — start a site, work hard, build an audience, and wait for some wonderful news outlet to come along and hire me. Given this, and my love for the Washington Monthly (which I’ve been reading assiduously since I was an undergrad), I’m genuinely thrilled. Joining me at Political Animal will be Hilzoy of Obsidian Wings, who, as one of my very favorite bloggers, only makes the news even better.

For Carpetbagger readers, the only thing that’s going to change is the url and the layout. I’m going to keep doing exactly what I’m doing now; just update your bookmarks and follow me to my new home.

My first day at the Monthly is this Friday, Aug. 22. The schedule will remain the same until then, but starting Friday morning, I’ll be posting full-time at Political Animal. Hope to see you there.

As you all know, without Steve, there wouldn’t be a Happy Hour Discurso. You can bet your fucking bippy I’ll be there!

(Question: does anyone here know what, exactly, a bippy is?)

Steve’s one of the hardest-working bloggers in the known universe. He’s also one of the funniest, kindest, and competent. He’s earned this, and I’m absolutely thrilled for him.

Kevin Drum had just better keep up the Friday Catblogging tradition over at Mother Jones, or I’m going to have to buy Steve two cats and a camera to compensate.

Steve’s not the only deserving person who got a better gig. MSNBC did the right thing and gave Rachel Maddow a show. I don’t watch television anymore – I barely manage to catch me some Daily Show and Colbert Report from time to time – but I might have to make an exception:

I’m very rarely encouraged by any of the decisions made by major news outlets. Yesterday afternoon, however, was a spectacular exception.

Rachel Maddow has been sounding off about politics on MSNBC so often she might as well have her own show.

And now she does.

The liberal commentator and Air America radio host, who has become a breakout star for the cable channel during the presidential campaign, is taking over the 9 p.m. slot following Keith Olbermann, whom she often subs for on “Countdown.” Olbermann broke what he called a “fully authorized leak” yesterday on the left-wing Web site Daily Kos. Dan Abrams, the former MSNBC general manager who had been hosting “Verdict” at that hour, will continue as NBC’s chief legal correspondent, become a “Dateline” contributor and serve as a daytime anchor for MSNBC.

A recent profile of Rachel in the Nation noted, “Maddow didn’t get here by bluster and bravado but with a combination of crisp thinking and galumphing good cheer. Remarkably, this season’s discovery isn’t a glossy matinee idol or a smooth-talking partisan hack but a PhD Rhodes scholar lesbian policy wonk who started as a prison AIDS activist.”

I’d just add that Rachel is, without doubt or hesitation, the best political observer on television, and her insightful analysis of the 2008 cycle has set a very high bar for the rest of the media to follow. The question hasn’t been whether Rachel would get her own prime-time show; the question has been why Rachel didn’t already have her own prime-time show.

That would be because the media moguls are fucking morons. It’s good to see them wising up a bit.

So, my darlings, raise your glasses high to two of the best people in political reporting. Salud!

Break Out the Bubbly

Surely You Jest, Sen. McCain!

That McCain. Always ready with a lame joke at someone else’s expense. Guy’s a groan a minute – he should go into improv.

Get a load of his latest schtick:

LAS CRUCES, N.M. — Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) called lobbyists “birds of prey” Wednesday and vowed to enforce a lifetime ban on lobbying for members of his administration.

“Whenever there’s a corrupt system, then you’re going to have these birds of prey descend on it to get their share of the spoils,” McCain said in a half-hour interview with Politico following a town-hall meeting in the southern part of this swing state.

Ha ha ha ha ha! Ho ho hee hee *snort* heh. That’s a good one, John. That’s really fucking hilarious! Because we all know you in actual fact love lobbyists:

In that same interview, McCain said “lobbyists don’t come to my office.” Maybe that’s because they’re too busy working for his campaign. According to reports, at least 150 lobbyists are working for and raising money for his campaign, including campaign manager Rick Davis, senior advisor Charlie Black, top foreign policy advisory Randy Scheunemann, and McCain’s handpicked Deputy Chair of the Republican National Committee Frank Donatelli. No wonder John McCain bragged in his 2002 book that he “can claim with gratitude a good number of lobbyists as friends and supporters.” In fact, the John McCain who called lobbyists “birds of prey” today called lobbying “an honorable profession” in 2005.

Poor News Blaze. They just didn’t get the joke, did they?

But McCain still has 115 lobbyists raising money and helping to run his campaign. And apparently, they all understand McCain’s anti-lobbyist efforts are simply for show:

At 4 p.m. Monday, campaign finance chair Susan Nelson convened a conference call with lobbyist supporters and fundraisers to assuage their bruised egos and pass along positive polling data, according to two participants in the session.

“I think they were trying to make the point that this is not an attack on lobbying or any of the people on the campaign,” said one participant in the conference call, speaking on condition of anonymity. “They want to move forward. My sense is everyone gets the joke.”

See? We’ve all known since May, when poor Johnny had to purge a few of his lobbyists to make it look good for the yokels, that he’s just joshing when he bashes lobbyists. It’s all in good fun.

After all, without his lobbyists, Johnny wouldn’t even have a campaign:

Surely You Jest, Sen. McCain!

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

Looks like Limbaugh is going for the open racism:

Yesterday on his radio show, right-wing talker Rush Limbaugh said it’s “striking how unqualified Obama is and how this whole thing came about within the Democrat Party. I think it really goes back to the fact
that nobody had the guts to stand up and
say no to a black guy.” Limbaugh continued:

I think this is a classic illustration here where affirmative action has reared its ugly head against them. It’s the reverse of it. They’ve, they’ve ended up nominating and placing at the top of their ticket somebody who’s not qualified, who has not earned it. […]


Because we all know that a black man can’t possibly win a nomination because people think his qualifications are just fine. Noper. Gotta be that affirmative action.

Hey, Lamebaugh, newflash for you: Obama won the nomination because he’s got popular policy ideas, he was right on the Iraq war, his foreign policy makes so much sense that even the Bush regime is quietly thieving elements of it, because he’s eloquent, and because he gives us hope. If that’s affirmative action, it makes a fuck of a lot of sense to me. I’ll take it.

Expect more of this shit. Neocons will attack anything and anyone, use every dirty trick in the book, and employ outrageous double-standards to get their way. Just look at what they’re doing to a Republican Vietnam veteran, for fuck’s sake:

Today on C-SPAN’s Washington Journal, a caller questioned Vets for Freedom (VFF) founder David Bellavia about the group’s attacks on Vietnam veteran Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE). Bellavia quickly praised Hagel, saying he was a “patriot.” “You don’t question another man’s service,” said Bellavia.” “I will never attack a Vietnam veteran, like some of these other individuals have during this political season.”

Content he paid enough lip-service to Hagel, he then began attacking the senator, an outspoken critic of the Bush administration. Bellavia’s dismissed the Hagel’s service in Vietnam — for which he earned a Vietnamese Cross of Gallantry, Purple Heart, Army Commendation Medal, and the Combat Infantryman Badge — as irrelevant to the current conflict:

BELLAVIA: Sen. Hagel has never been shot at in Iraq, he’s never seen what an IED looks like or been detonated on. This is an individual that could embed himself instead of doing a two-day congressional delegation. Go out there, walk with the troops, see what’s going on on the ground. […]

Now, again, with Sen. Hagel — my problem with Sen. Hagel is, again, his experienced is based on what? The Mekong Delta. It’s based to Vietnam, a totally different fight, a totally different enemy, and by the way, it was 30 years ago.

Fascinating. Senator Hagel’s Vietnam experience was “30 years ago” and is “completely irrelevant.” Let’s just take that at face value, shall we? If that’s the case, then John McCain’s Vietnam service, his status as a POW all those years ago, all of that’s “completely irrelevant.” And that might help explain why McLame’s foreign policy and ideas on the current wars are so incredibly bad.

If you’re going to attack a Vietnam vet on his service, you neocons, be very careful how you do it, or it’s going to blow back and take your heads off. Guaranteed. And I’ll enjoy the sight more than I can possibly say.

We can’t expect much more than this sort of schlock from the Party of Hypocrites. Just check out who’s delivering their keynote speech at the Republicon convention: Rudy “The state pays for my affairs” Giuliani. Carpetbagger makes an excellent point:

It’s been a while, but it’s worth keeping in mind that Giuliani ran one of the more embarrassing presidential campaigns in recent memory and lost every contest in which he competed, usually by enormous margins. He invested millions and ended up without a single delegate.

The rationale behind giving Giuliani this high-profile slot is … well, I’m not quite sure what the rationale is. Maybe the McCain gang decided they haven’t heard “9/11″ and “stay on offense” quite enough.

Just to provide some additional context, though, Jonathan Stein raises an interesting point: “John Edwards cheated on his wife. The media found out about it. John Edwards will not be attending the Democratic convention. Rudy Giuliani used public funds to cheat on his wife and used city agencies to cover his tracks. The media found out about it. Rudy Giuliani will be delivering the keynote at the Republican convention.”

It is odd. Spitzer and Edwards get caught having affairs, and their careers are finished in Democratic politics. Giuliani and Gingrich get caught having affairs, and they remain high-profile Republicans in good standing. Hmm.

Hmm, indeed. I think that says all we’ll ever need to know about the party of “family values.”

And finally, for your viewing pleasure, here’s McCain taking dead aim at both of his feet and preparing to pull the trigger:

At first blush, this report in the New York Sun seems to have very little relevance to the presidential campaign.

Republican or Democrat, will make a Syrian-Israeli peace agreement a priority only if the two sides, meeting now in Turkey, make substantial progress before the inauguration.

That is what a foreign policy adviser to Senator Obama tol
d Syria’s foreign minister last month while on a visit to Damascus. While the trip was not connected to the Obama campaign, Daniel Kurtzer nonetheless provided Foreign Minister Walid al-Moallem with some advice of his own.

“I urged him to move ahead in the Israel-Syria negotiations as much as possible so that whoever is the next president would not start from too far down the track,” Mr. Kurtzer, a former American ambassador to Israel, said yesterday in a phone interview. “I did not say anything about Obama or McCain. I said whoever is the next president is not going to want to inherit a process that isn’t going anywhere.”

Kurtzer was in Damascus for a law conference, he wasn’t representing Obama in any way, he isn’t even a paid member of Obama’s staff, and he’s in no way authorized by anyone to engage in any kind of official diplomacy a foreign government. He’s just a former ambassador with some friendly (and fairly obvious) words of advice for Syrian officials.

Nevertheless, a McCain campaign source told Greg Sargent the Republican campaign is poised to jump on this as evidence of … well, something nefarious. Indeed, it appears that Rudy Giuliani will help lead the outraged mob, which will denounce “an Obama campaign Middle East adviser” traveling to Damascus “for meetings with Syrian officials.”


Carpetbagger explains why this would be an awesome thing for McCain to do. By all means, attack on this front. We could use the entertainment.

Republicons. They just get more ridiculous every day, don’t they?

Happy Hour Discurso

B-B-But He Was a PRISONER of WAR!!11!1!

Oh, for fuck’s sake:

For several weeks I’ve been issuing joking disclaimers that my criticisms of McCain on completely unrelated subjects should not be considered an attack on his service in Vietnam. (I did it earlier today.) It never occurred to me that they’d actually go there but, apparently, the suggestion that McCain might have heard the questions before he appeared on stage at the Saddleback event — because he wasn’t in a “cone of silence” after all — is impugning his integrity as a POW. For real:

Nicolle Wallace, a spokeswoman for Mr. McCain, said on Sunday night that Mr. McCain had not heard the broadcast of the event while in his motorcade and heard none of the questions.

“The insinuation from the Obama campaign that John McCain, a former prisoner of war, cheated is outrageous,” Ms. Wallace said.

Oh, yeah, right. He can’t fucking cheat because he was a fucking prisoner of war, which as we all know turns people into perfect fucking saints.

If that’s the case, why are we so fucking worried about the poor bastards rotting in Gitmo? They should be bloody angels by now. But I digress.

The best damned thing that ever happened to McCain was getting tossed in the Hanoi Hilton. Seriously. It’s like a magic spell: “But he was a prisoner of war.” Ting! Justlikethat, whatever stupid, evil, dishonest fuckery he’s been up to gets magicked right away. Heaven forfend some asshole blogger should ever doubt the super-duper powers of the POW wand:

To be sure, it’s obvious that McCain’s detention as a young man in Vietnam helped shape his life, and it’s not unreasonable that he’d want voters to know about his experience.

But that’s not a license to force the “P.O.W. card” into every unrelated question.

Last week, when the Rev. Kirbyjon Caldwell, a close Bush ally, publicly questioned McCain’s character, the McCain campaign responded by highlighting McCain’s background as a prisoner of war. When Dems attacked McCain’s healthcare plan in May, McCain responded by noting his background as a prisoner of war. Asked by a local reporter about the first thing that comes to his mind when he thinks of Pittsburgh, McCain responded by talking about his background as a prisoner of war.

And all of this, of course, dovetails with the McCain campaign running multiple television ads talking about McCain’s background as a prisoner of war, literally including interrogation footage in the commercial.

You know something? I’m so sick of this bullshit I’m about to explode. Because while Carpetbagger and Digby and you and me understand that having been unlucky (or incompetent) enough to be shot down and captured does not instantly make a person into a foreign policy expert with leadership qualities out the wazoo, others apparently fall for this shit. They’re so intimidated by the myth their brains just shut down when they hear the letters POW.

You know what? Mine doesn’t. This is how much respect I have for John’s magic letters: Surviving the experience with mind intact was, no doubt, an accomplishment. Bravo, John. Now shut the fuck up.

Because this is just crass. Real heroes don’t strut around wearing their POW status like a medal. They don’t hide snivelling behind it every time they get caught doing something wrong. Real leaders do not need to use their wartime victimization as a crutch to prop up their empty bag of a campaign.

Got that, Johnny?

And I fucking dare, oh, I fucking triple-dog dare, you rabid fuckers to come after me. You know who you are. You’re the ones as sensitive as an open nerve when it comes to the slightest hint of tarnish on St. John’s aluminum armor. You’re the ones who scream and stamp your feet and demand the heads of everyone who has the guts to call bullshit when McLame starts whining about how being a POW puts him beyond any and all criticism.

Go right the fuck ahead. Bring it on.

Let’s see how good you look attacking a rape survivor. I’m so ready to play that game.

I hope you brought a hat. You’ll need it for your teeth.

B-B-But He Was a PRISONER of WAR!!11!1!

In Which I Answer a Reader's Question, and Tell a Story About a Story

In this post, I mentioned I’d been out on the balcony smoking a cigarette when a rather astounding ethical question slammed into my poor abused brain. In the comments, MalwareBeGone asks:

Wouldn’t a shot (or 4) of Tequila help with these ethical questions? Better than nicotine?

Indeed it would. A bottle, in fact, would do wonders. Only problem being, with the exception of a single story, I only ever write fiction stone fucking sober.

Nicotine and caffeine. That’s the extent of my drug use. Oh, I’ve tried writing drunk. I can rant like no one else when I’ve got demon rum coursing through my veins. I can follow flights of the mind through the longest, oddest journal entries when Jose Cuervo and I are getting friendly. And it’s fine stuff – barely even a typo. Coherent sentences, even.

I sit down to write fiction with a margarita to hand, however, and the damned well goes dry. I think my Muse gets jealous. Have I mentioned she’s a sadist? She likes to make me suffer. And when I’m drinking, I’m not suffering – I’m an effusively cheerful drunk.

Now imagine my surprise when I ran across a story I couldn’t write sober.

Many years ago, in the afterglow of a Circus Mexicus, I’d sat down at my desk with a pitcher of margaritas. Didn’t intend to write any fiction. Just intended to get drunk. Really drunk. And listen to the Peacemakers, and stare happily at a blank page whilst I dreamt of the concert in a happy haze.

A few hours later, I was staring at the beginnings of an origin story. It shocked me because a) I’d never written a damned word drunk before, b) the character in question had never struck me as a Peacemakers’ fan and c) he sure as fuck hadn’t struck me as a man determined to drown himself in alcohol.

Weird.

I thought it might be good. I thought that might be the alcohol talking. So I walked – well, weaved – away from it, and left it to sit overnight. It would probably look like total schlock in the harsh light of sobriety. No problemo – that’s what the delete function is for.

Only. Only, when I snuck a wary peek at it sober, it actually looked good.

I spent a few days working out issues of continuity, exploring the events that had led to poor Galen drinking himself to death in Mexico, and pulling Peacemakers’ quotes to build the rest of the story around. Then, with the basic trajectory of the plot firmly in mind, willfully sober, I plunked myself down to write the rest.

Lead balloons weren’t even in it. The prose took flight just like an emu strapped to an anchor. The few paragraphs I managed were so wooden you could’ve put them through a sawmill and built a damn fine deck.

But, you know, I write sober, so I persisted for a day or so. I did not want to become the kind of author who relies on alcohol for inspiration. That way lies Hemmingway, and Hunter S. Thompson land. Or so my corseted upbringing and the self-righteous proclamations of good Mormon boy Orson Scott Card like to have me believe.

When I had enough wood to build a mansion, I deleted everything back to where I’d started writing sober and reconsidered.

Time for an experiment, then.

I mixed another pitcher.

I drank.

I wrote.

It took me, if I remember right (and mind you, this is hazy, for obvious reasons), about two or three weeks to finish the story. Did you know you can get thoroughly sick of drinking margaritas every night? And it had to be margaritas. Tried rum one night, and tanked again: this story demanded tequila, specifically.

I went through a fuck of a lot of tequila.

The only part of the story I wrote semi-sober was the end, where Galen’s sobering up himself. I realized I’d had to follow his trajectory to get this one right. And it worked. Aside from some awkwardness when fangirldom hijacked the story (part of it takes place at the Peacemakers’ Circus Mexicus show), it all flowed just right. I adore that story. Someday, an editor will, too.

But that’s the only one. I’ve never written another story drunk. A scene, here or there, but never a whole and entire story. Not for lack of trying, mind you – I do love a good drink.

Which is precisely why I envy the fuckers who can drink like fish and write like demigods.

****

For those of you who may desire a sip from the above mentioned story: Excerpt from “Ninth Wave”, by Dana Hunter.

IV.

Barkeep
We need to go around again
One for me and what’s-his-name
My new best friend
Roger Clyne and the Peacemakers, Mekong

“The bodyguard’s cardinal sin is getting involved with your client,” I tell the off-duty federale at JJ’s. “You don’t do that. But I did. But I thought I wouldn’t break the cardinal rule. See, if you do get involved, you make damned sure you keep them safe. But I didn’t. That’s why I’m here.”

He orders another round on me. “You have much guilt.”

“Damn straight.” I throw the tequila back. I’m beyond limes. The burn is sweet and pure, the only pure thing left in a defiled world. “Do you know what the Irish did to sinners? They sent them beyond the ninth wave, out of the country, bam. In a little boat. No sails, no rudder, just a knife and some water. Not salt water. Fresh. And maybe some mead. No one sent me beyond the ninth wave. I came here myself. Irwin gave me his condo, not a boat. But it’s all the same thing anyway. Because I committed the cardinal sin.”

“Love is no sin,” he says. Sunlight from the door creeps into the dark room and washes the old wood beams and my new friend in sepia. He looks very wise, a mestizo messiah who’s come down from the dry mountains to enlighten me. “Is very painful, si, but no sin. You should not feel guilty for that.”

“Thank you for saying that.” I lean over the scarred wooden bar and grasp his wrist, knocking my glass askew. Good thing it’s empty. “Let me tell you one thing. You see red eyes out there, you get the fuck away from them. They’ll tear you apart.”

He grins. “Your mujer, she had red eyes?”

“No. Her killers did.”

He looks at me sideways. Crazy gringo. Mad drunk. Yes, I know. But I don’t want to see this man die under fang and claw some night on a lonely patrol. He’s doing a hard job, and he listened to me pour out my woes, so I grasp his
wrist harder and try to make him understand. “There are bad things out there, amigo. Muy malo. Stay away from them. You may think you can shoot them with a gun, but you can’t. I know. I tried. But they didn’t die because they’ve got special protection.” Something Danika said filters through the tequila murk. “It’s like a kind of force shield. Only blades get through it. So you can’t kill them unless you’re trained. You’ve got to just run.”

Si, si.” He prises my fingers away and sees the wristband. “You should go. Your concert is soon.”

Concert. Salvation. Answers. Right. I rise unsteadily. People stare at me as I weave out of the bar, an unshaven wreck of a man. I used to look at people like me with the same disgust, condemn self-pity with the same righteousness, but now I know what the relentless obsession of grief and guilt is. El federale kept me going for a few hours with his sympathies and commiserations. I just wish that a generous ear could drain the poison from the festering wound my psyche’s become.

In Which I Answer a Reader's Question, and Tell a Story About a Story

Faux News Pwnd by 12 Year-old

I know there are people in this country who take Faux News seriously. I have no idea why:

Wow, Faux really blew it here, bringing in a 12 year old Ossetian girl “hero” to talk about how bad the Russian aggression was, first-hand, only to have the girl stop the flow of the interview and point out that her ordeal was caused by Georgian troops, and she thanks the Russians who helped her escape.

Note to Faux: the key to effective propaganda is to ensure that the children and aunts you’re attempting to exploit for your agenda don’t completely fucking contradict your agenda with first-hand experience. This is why you should employ something we like to call journalism to discover these little things we like to call facts.

The look of shock on that anchor’s face when his carefully constructed Ruskies are eeeevvviiiiillll!!1!!11! piece started tumbling down round his ears was completely priceless. So was the “That’s what the Russians want” lame-ass attempt at rescuing the situation.

How I love watching the eggs break all over Faux News’s dear little faces.

For bonus fuckwittery relating to Faux News fuckups and the people who blindly believe them, see here.

Faux News Pwnd by 12 Year-old

Happy Hour Discurso

Today’s opining on the public discourse.

It’s official. Bush has a scorched-earth policy:

F. Chase Hutto III, a senior aide to Vice President Dick Cheney with a long history of promoting anti-environmental regulation policy, is a top choice for a post at the Energy Department, the Washington Post reports today.

Hutto, who is being considered for the position of assistant secretary for policy and international affairs, has been a contact within the administration for the oil and gas industry on energy and environmental issues.

The administration’s controversial decision to delay action on regulating greenhouse gas emissions was shaped in part by Hutto.


Highlights of this dumbass’s career are here.

Bush has a perfect record of chosing the worst possible people for jobs. I’d love to get my hands on the interview questions. One of them has got to be, “Are you completely opposed to the purpose and principles of the department you want to work in?” It’s like it’s permanent Opposite Day at the Bush White House, and the assclown in office is doing his level best to ensure he leaves America destroyed behind him.

And then we have McLame, babbling the bullshit about offshore drilling on an oil rig. Well, let’s have a look at what might be driving his determination to drill:

It should come as no surprise that the McCain chose to visit a Chevron-owned drilling platform, considering that lobbyists for Chevron both fundraise and work for his campaign:

Wayne Berman: Berman, the managing director of lobbying firm Ogilvy Government Relations, is McCain’s national finance co-chairman and has bundled over $500,000 dollars for his campaign. Berman has lobbied for Chevron since 2004.

John Green: Green, who also works for Oglivy, has been the McCain campaign’s chief Congressional liaison since March. Green has lobbied for Chevron since 2005.

Richard Hohlt: Hohlt, who is the leader of a group of Washington, DC insiders called the “Off the Record Club” that includes top McCain strategist Charlie Black, is a fundraiser for the McCain campaign. Holht has lobbied for Chevron since 2005.


In June, McCain went before oil executives in Texas to reverse his position on offshore
drilling and lay out a set of policy proposals that add up to
a big fat kiss to Big Oil. Since
then, the oil industry has
flooded McCain with money and McCain has begun promoting the advice of “the oil executives.”


Yup. Big Oil has big pockets, and McCain’s happily snuggled right inside of ’em.

Continuing our delve into dirty energy, let’s see what Peabody Coal’s head honcho has got to say about his product:

Speaking to USA Today, Gregory Boyce, CEO of Peabody, the world’s largest coal company, “shrugged off any worries” about coal’s enormous greenhouse gas emissions or moves to make energy more environmentally friendly, declaring the U.S. would never move away from coal:

“It’s a good time to be Peabody,” says Boyce, an affable man who speaks in a confident baritone. “There’s not enough natural gas. There’s not enough renewables (such as wind and solar energy) to go around. So I’m not concerned that coal is going to disappear. For us not to use that resource, we are just shooting ourselves in the foot.” […]

“There’s a perception out there that coal is dirty, and we have to change that,” he adds, noting that coal plants already have cut emissions of some pollutants and boosted efficiency to slash CO2 discharges. “Black is the new green.”


My ass. Black is the new green only if we l
earn to live in monochrome. And develop lungs that run on dirty air. Oh, and don’t mind that runaway greenhouse effect stuff. Peabody’s been lying about the environmental impact of its product for generations.

The last thing this country needs is more drilling and more mining. What this country needs is a completely new energy policy that will explore clean, renewable energy. We need to enrich America, not the fat bastards who so love to rape it.

If McCain gets elected, I’m afraid that a continued assault is all we have to look forward to.

Happy Hour Discurso

A Vote I Feel Good About

I’ve been so focused on national politics, keeping ye olde blog happily updated, and this bloody story that I very nearly missed the Washington State primary election. I’ve really got to keep better tabs on my political email.

It’s a damned good thing Washington state plumps for absentee ballots, or tomorrow would’ve been a clusterfuck. Damned good thing my roommate put the ballot where I could find it. Especially since she’s on it. This is the first time I’ve gotten to vote for someone I know in a statewide election. Just don’t ask me what I’m voting for – I can’t remember the official name of the position, but it’s basically sending her off to make sure Obama plants his ass in the Oval Office.


This also marks the first election in which I am delighted to fill in the little bubble next to a politician’s name. My Congressman, Jay Inslee, is up for re-election.

I’ve spent the entirety of this year wanting to vote for that man.

I come from Arizona, where your choice is a) a noxious Republicon or b) a Democrat without a hope in hell of winning the damned election. I’ve never been represented by a person who actually represented me. Then I moved up here, and started filling in petitions, and discovered what it feels like to have perfect trust in a politician.

Damned good, is how. Muy bueno. Tres bien, even.

I can trust Jay. Oh, I’ll grant you, there’s some things in his voting record he and I could quibble over, just as there is with any politician. For instance, that yes vote on that “Importance of Christmas and Christianity” bullroar, I could definitely give him some guff for (although he rather made up for it by voting against the National Day of Prayer). But that kind of thing pales in comparison to issues that matter. And on those, he speaks for me.

Use of Military Force Against Iraq: NO
Military Commissions Act of 2006: NO
Stem Cell Research bills: YES
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 Amendments Act of 2008 NO

Oh, I could go on. SCHIP, Social Security, Minimum Wage, and a ton of other issues, but I haven’t got time for more than some highlights. It’s enough to show that on the most important issues, he’s got our backs.

Whenever I sign petitions, I get long, thoughtful emails from Jay explaining his positions and thanking me for my input. I’ve published one here. I should publish more. All I can say is, it’s pretty unique to get a little thrill of excitement when an email from a Congressman lands in my box. Other politicians for the most part just send a one or two paragraph response saying “thanks for participating in democracy, good on you, here’s some pablum that won’t tell you if I heard one fucking word you said and have a nice day.” Not Jay. I don’t get emails from him so much as treatises. I’m not left wondering if I’ve just been petitioning a brick wall. I know what he’s thinking, and why, and then he backs that up with his vote.

You know what that makes me feel like? An adult. A valued constituent. More than just a person who can be snookered into voting. I even get the sense that if he takes a stand against an issue I’m passionate about, he’ll make sure I understand why. And it will be well-reasoned, make sense, and even if we remain in disagreement, I can at least respect his position. That’s purely hypothetical, o’ course, because he’s been right in line with my own thinking on the important stuff since I moved here.

I appreciate being represented by a good, intelligent man who truly cares about this country. He does his job very well indeed. And that’s why I felt so damned good filling in that little bubble by his name. I even would’ve hauled my sorry arse out of bed early to vote in person if I hadn’t found my absentee ballot in the nick o’ time.

If Jay Inslee ever runs for President, I’ll be working my ass off for his campaign. Guaranteed. And it’s going to feel fantastic making sure he remains my Congressman for many years to come.

Yeah, I’m a fan of my congressman. However did you guess?

A Vote I Feel Good About