Teaching Religious Skepticism

John Shook has a post up over at CFI about scientific skepticism versus rationalist skepticism with regard to religious claims. He notes that calls for scientific skepticism are not universal among skeptics, and he gives a fascinating bit of history on who originated the call for scientific skepticism to be applied to religion. Read the whole thing.

The first comment, however, raises a misconception that I’d like to address:

Whenever I hear someone talk about what other people should/should not accept/believe as if they know the absolute truth, I wonder how they differ from all of the other people who think that they, too, know the absolute truth.

Here’s the thing: That’s not what we do. It’s a common misconception based, I think, in the fact that we tend to get more attention when we’re talking about politics than when we’re talking about belief and epistemology (and the fact that you can now find atheist skeptics talking among themselves), but it isn’t true. There is no knowledge of absolute truth required to talk about what people should or shouldn’t accept as the skeptical position on religion. Continue reading “Teaching Religious Skepticism”

Teaching Religious Skepticism
{advertisement}

Skepticism, Religion, and Strawmen

Daniel Loxton has a post up at Skepticblog today titled “‘Testable Claims’ is Not a ‘Religious Exemption’“. Although the article doesn’t specify or provide any links, it is, in large part, a response to PZ’s recent “divorce” from the organized skeptical movement and the arguments leading up to it. From Loxton’s article:

What are we to make of accusations that skepticism’s “testable claims” scope is a cynical political dodge, a way to present skeptics as brave investigators while conveniently arranging to leave religious feathers unruffled? Like the other clichés of my field (“skeptics are in the pocket of Big Pharma!”) this complaint is probably immortal. No matter how often this claim is debunked, it will never go away.

Nonetheless, it is grade-A horseshit. It’s become a kind of urban legend among a subset of the atheist community—a misleading myth in which a matter of principle is falsely presented as a disingenuous ploy. There is (and this cannot be emphasized enough) no “religious exemption” in skepticism. Skeptics do and always have busted religious claims.

Loxton sounds a bit frustrated, and well he may. He’s said this sort of thing plenty of times before, but it hasn’t settled the claims. Of course, there’s a reason for that. Loxton is completely missing the point. Continue reading “Skepticism, Religion, and Strawmen”

Skepticism, Religion, and Strawmen

So You Don't Have To

A couple of weekends ago, I was at Omegacon for a bit of enforced relaxation. Yes, it really is an F&SF convention that people attend in their pajamas.

While we were there, a couple of my network mates and I got together with our friends from the Geeks Without God podcast to play Left Behind: The Movie, The Board Game Adventure. (I swear to you on all that is unholy that this is really the name of the game.) Being who we are, we also set up a microphone to capture the event.

I can’t tell you how much we were looking forward to this. It played no small part in the decision to leave my bedroom after an insane week that involved a business trip and traveling to the emergency room before dawn in a city I’d never been to before. Yes, everyone will be fine, but I was a bit of a wreck. But this! The Left Behind board game! The lulz!

How can you not play this game when offered the opportunity?!

Well, frankly, you can just listen to the podcast. We weren’t expecting anything good, but this game was bad in the very worst way that a game can be bad. All I can say is hooray for making up your own rules. And for moonshine-soaked cherries. Those helped even those of us who don’t like booze.

So go listen. Play the podcast drinking game if you feel so inclined. If you still feel you must play this when you’re done, leave a comment at Geeks Without God. I don’t know whether they’ve found a new home for the game, but I know no one there wanted to keep it, even as a novelty.

So You Don't Have To

Ready for the End of the World

It isn’t news that some believers are so ready for the end times that they’re ready to help bring it about. It is news, however, and slightly terrifying, just how many of these believers there are.

“[T]he fact that such an overwhelming percentage of Republican citizens profess a belief in the Second Coming (76 percent in 2006, according to our sample) suggests that governmental attempts to curb greenhouse emissions would encounter stiff resistance even if every Democrat in the country wanted to curb them,” Barker and Bearce wrote in their study, which will be published in the June issue of Political Science Quarterly.

The study, based on data from the 2007 Cooperative Congressional Election Study, uncovered that belief in the “Second Coming” of Jesus reduced the probability of strongly supporting government action on climate change by 12 percent when controlling for a number of demographic and cultural factors. When the effects of party affiliation, political ideology, and media distrust were removed from the analysis, the belief in the “Second Coming” increased this effect by almost 20 percent.

Just in case you wondered why some of us are interested in loosening belief and encouraging uncertainty, well, our futures may depend on it.

Ready for the End of the World

Paying for Their Protests

I have been reminded that this Friday is Good Friday. (I don’t keep track of these things on my own.) That means it’s that special day of the year when schoolkids and other amateur protestors are bused to clinics that offer abortions to show their piety by chanting and carrying signs before going off to church to celebrate torture and death.

In response, two local traditions have sprung up. The first is a counter-protest, which gives something for the protestors to focus on other than the clinic escorts and patients. With amateur protestors, this is important for avoiding incidents. Minnesota Atheists let their Meetup group members–through our own awesome Brianne–know how to sign up for a slot. If you have a local atheist group, they may do the same. If they don’t, you can sign up for Planned Parenthood action alerts and check their advocacy site for your area for details on this year’s counter-protests. Then ask your group to get involved with Planned Parenthood or other local, targeted clinic for next year’s protests.

The other tradition, the tradition that is dear to my evil little heart, is sponsoring protestors. For $10, you can say to a protestor (though don’t do it at the counter-protest; save it for that special family member or college acquaintance on Facebook), “Because of you and your actions today, Planned Parenthood is now better funded than it was before. Thank you for inspiring me to do my part to keep safe, legal abortions accessible.” How is that not irresistible if you have the money to do it?

What else happens on Good Friday on this front in parts of the country or world that aren’t Minnesota?

Paying for Their Protests

Interfaith Dialog at Normandale

Normandale Community College has been very good to atheists and humanists, at least as outside speakers and, from what I’ve seen, students as well. I regularly speak to comparative religion classes there, and they’ve hosted a panel discussion on atheism and morality that I was part of.

In a couple of weeks, I’ll be back at Normandale as part of an interfaith dialog aimed at helping a diverse student group better understand, if not appreciate, where each other is coming from on religion.

Flyer for dialog between Christian, Humanist, Muslim, and Jewish representatives.

If you’re free on the afternoon of April 9, please come out and join us.

Interfaith Dialog at Normandale

Ways of Knowing

A perpetual pet peeve is the concept of “different ways of knowing”. All too often, it’s a shorthand for “Don’t take my cherished beliefs away!”

Sometimes it refers to real phenomena. Observation is an important part of collecting information about our world, but our society has a nasty tendency to limit the groups of people we consider to be valid observers. Or we get so focused on rigorous strategies for making observations that we forget that our ideas about what we should observe come from less rigorous, less formal processes. We exclude personal observation, particularly from marginalized groups, instead of understanding it as a first step to more structured observations.

Much of the time, though, what people refer to as “ways of knowing” have nothing to do with epistemology. What we’re talking about isn’t knowing. We aren’t talking about ways to collect information we can rely on, but ways to conceptualize the world. We’re talking about ways to share perspectives or frames of reference with other people. We’re talking about making things make sense, not figuring out what is and what is not.

It’s still busy around here, so I don’t have time to flesh the idea out, but I wanted to throw it out for discussion. How much of the confusion over “ways of knowing” really because we should be differentiating between those and “ways of understanding” or “ways of communicating”.

Discuss.

Ways of Knowing

Atheist Activism in the Real World

The classic model of U.S. atheist activism is the strict maintenance of church-state separation. Keep creationism out of classrooms. Keep prayer out of government meetings and government money out of the hands of churches. Keep crosses off public land.

This is worthwhile activism. Having ancestors who were kicked out of Massachusetts for being the wrong kind of Baptist and watching atheists across the globe pay for their lack of belief with their freedoms and their lives, I understand just how critical a strong wall of separation is. However, this kind of activism is just the very basics.

If you have a weak or small atheist movement, keeping the government from falling under religious control will necessarily be your first and maybe your only priority. This was the case in the U.S. for decades. It isn’t anymore.

The atheist movement has grown at an amazing rate in recent years. That’s not surprising. Recent numbers from the Pew foundation say there are more of us than there are Mormons. If they can run a state and two presidential candidates in the last election, we have the numbers to make things happen–more things than just conducting lawsuits, things that affect most people’s daily lives far more than one of these lawsuits will.

When religion is this pervasive and entrenched, it contributes to problems in every sphere. When religion holds as much power as it does, it plays a large role in maintaining the injustices of the status quo. On tonight’s panel are several atheist activists who are working on problems well beyond church-state separation. Their work brings them into communities frequently invisible in organized atheism–communities in which atheism is often invisible or unthinkable.

Yet there they are, because there is meaningful, necessary work to be done. And they join us tonight to help us understand how to move atheist activism outside the narrow confines of the court and make it relevant to the rest of the world.

This is my introduction to tonight’s panel at DePaul University with Sikivu Hutchinson, Anthony Pinn, Ian Cromwell, and Ashley Miller. If you’re in the area, don’t forget to come out. There will be socializing afterward as well.

Atheist Activism in the Real World

No Feminists at Beliefnet

Beliefnet, in its own words:

Beliefnet, a property of BN Media, LLC, is the most comprehensive online resource for inspiration and spirituality. With a mission to help people find and walk a spiritual path that instills comfort, hope, strength and happiness for people who are exploring their own faith or are curious about others, Beliefnet is the leading source of information spiritual information presented without a defined editorial point-of-view. Whether you’re looking for spirituality, health and wellness, entertainment or more, Beliefnet has something for everyone. [emphasis theirs]

Kristine Holmgren, in her own words:

As a pastor — especially as a woman pastor — the Rev. Kristine Holmgren is used to being in the public eye.

In addition to speaking from the pulpit, Holmgren has reached people across the country through the informally syndicated column she wrote for the (Minneapolis) Star Tribune and as a commentator for National Public Radio.

That exposure has perhaps helped prepare her for her newest venture as a playwright.

Sounds like a match made in that heaven they share a belief in, right?  Well, not according to the news from Jim Romanesko. Continue reading “No Feminists at Beliefnet”

No Feminists at Beliefnet

The (Very) Simple Virtues

Alain de Botton has found another piece of religion he thinks atheists should adopt. He thinks we should claim the idea of virtues for ourselves–with changes, of course. In fact, he’s listed ten of them.

They are…simple. I mean that in a couple of ways. They are not only obvious choices for virtues (you won’t find any surprises on that page), but they are also presented simply. An example:

1. Resilience. Keeping going even when things are looking dark; accepting that reversals are normal; remembering that human nature is, in the end, tough. Not frightening others with your fears.

Hurrah for resilience! Hurrah for people who keep going in the face of continued setbacks! Hurrah for the people who stick anything out, no matter how ugly! Hurrah for the people who exhaust their resources! Hurrah for the people who suffer fear in silence!

Or, you know, not.
Continue reading “The (Very) Simple Virtues”

The (Very) Simple Virtues