A Bunch of Snarky Answers to “Questions from White Men to SJWs”

(EDITED TITLE BECAUSE WHERE THE FUCK DID I GET 31 FROM? I DUNNO)

Because I don’t want to give the video itself clicks (the cover picture looks like a direct reference to a dear friend who has suffered from harassment that ended up making her sick), here’s a response by Kevin Logan to that video where he just plays the audio.

There were some questions he didn’t answer because they didn’t apply to him, and I want to answer a few as well.  Some of the dudes I recognized by voice (TJ, Undoomed, Call of Dusty, and Armored Skeptic immediately come to mind), some I didn’t, and I don’t care.  They’re all whiny white men whining very whinefully because the world is changing around them and they don’t like it and also TJ needs monies.

Also, I’m in a terrible mood, so I hope this will help me feel better, so here’s your favorite Social Justice Daemon trying to have a laugh:

  • Do you realize that your war on language through political correctness has made you bedfellows with true rape culture? In other words, Islam, the world’s most misogynistic ideology.

…Whut? I don’t know how the jump from “political correctness” to “Islam” was made, but give this guy a fucking medal. Every ‘rape culture’ is true ‘rape culture’ and singling out Islam does nothing but hide your denial that such a thing exists here.

  • Why do you claim to speak for LGBT people, women, ethnic minorities, but when LGBT people, women, ethnic minorities disagree, you harass them?

Well, as an LGBT ethnic minority woman, I remember that we’re not the Borg and aren’t going to agree on everything.  I speak for me and others like me (unless and until they want to speak for themselves). You don’t think all SJWs are white women, do you?

  • Do you want women to be equal or do you want women to be a protected class. You can’t have both. If you expect society to treat women as equal with men, why don’t women have to take responsibility for their own safety?

Hey, dude from the first question, here’s an example of rape culture that’s a world and religion- wide thing.

*ahem* We are not asking to be a protected class just because blaming the victim for not doing whatever you think should be ‘enough’ to prevent rape.  Oh, and we still want to be treated as equal to men.  Those can happen at the same time. They ought to be.

  • What do you think will happen if you leave your safe space?

Personally, I melt into a puddle.  An SJPubble-ewe to be exact.  Do you honestly have no idea what a safe space even means?  You and your fellows are in one of your own right now in this video. What do you think will happen if you left yours?

  • How can you possibly justify the idea that it’s somehow racist to disagree with Black Lives Matter and yet it’s not racist when a black person tweets something like “Kill all white people”?

Because all white people must be killed, duh.  

That was a shitty joke.  Look up power deferentials and get back to me. Also, disagreeing with Black Lives Matter doesn’t make sense.  What exactly are you disagreeing with? The concept of police accountability? The protests? The four queer Black women who started the whole thing?  What?

  • Are you aware that the present is not the past? I’m not kidding. Are you familiar with the concept of linear time? Because you seem incredibly comfortable travelling back through to time to talk about how bad things were for women or black people or whoever and then by using some form of SJW magic you claim or imply that those problems in the past exist today? Are you aware that this trick that you’re doing is not working? Why do you think that would work?

Haw Haw, we’re living in the past because we keep bringing it up.  Well, you might not be aware of a little thing: Most of these problems still exists.  It might be illegal to enslave folks, but our prisons sure do love squeezing barely paid labor out of their charges. Rape is illegal and it hasn’t stopped happening and too many victims (of all genders) don’t get justice.

  • Do you really think you can spend your entire life in a state of perpetual emotional immaturity? Do you actually imagine that you will be able to stretch out your adolescence for your entire existence?

tl;dr verison: When will you grow up?

Whenever you decide to give all of those “caring about people who aren’t like you” things a try.  Don’t you worry, I won’t hold my breath.

  • There are 13% more women in college right now than men. So if the whole goal of feminism is equality, shouldn’t we have some men-only scholarships in order to equal it out?

I’m sorry, is your Google broken? Seek and ye shall find, lazy.

  • If feminism and egalitarianism are both for  equal rights, then why does one start with a gendered prefix and the other is entirely gender neutral?

Because fucksticks like you are scared of lady cooties, so you have this word that you can use while doing, as Logan pointed out in his video, fuck all.

  • What do you hope to gain by bringing back racial segregation?

What do you hope to gain by lying through your teeth? What segregation? Was there an explanation TJ edited out or was that your whole question?

  • When my granduncle was dropping bombs on London, did your grandparents get out of their bunkers to protest with signs that read Not All Nazis?

Dude, it’s kinda hard to protest when you never know when Nazi jackasses like your granduncle would be flying by with more payloads.  

Also, YES ALL NAZIS.

  • Why do you think every cis white male is born racist? Racism is a learned behavior.

And from the looks of things, some of y’all refuse to work to UNlearn that shit.

  • How can you possibly say the phrase “all lives matter” is somehow racist. It sounds like something the Dalai Lama would say?

Fuck the Dalai Lama. Also, you might want to check on your ability to Google; it might be broken too, or you would find so many, many, many explanations about why ‘all lives matter’ is an ignorant thing to say.

  • Would you rather be right or popular? It seems like your primary objective is to score social points and get public validation. You speak publicly in the same way people write their dating profiles. Stop trying to demonstrate how awesome you are and get real.

Right.  I like being right so much that being called out as wrong makes me want to set my knowledge right ASAP.  Also, isn’t describing who you are being real?  Should I describe someone who isn’t me.  That’s way not awesome.

  • So if a drunk man sleeps with a drunk woman, the woman is incapable of giving consent but the man is?

*deep sigh* You think you hit the jackpot, don’t you. If a drunk man and a drunk woman are fucking each other – whatever, have fun. If either one of them didn’t agree to fucking, then it’s rape.  What is this with the weird “two blackout drunks fucking” scenarios?

  • is it really easier to spend your life trying to pacify the world and subdue all around you instead of accepting that you are the person who has to change?

Elon No

  • When I’m singing along with rap music is it okay if i say the work nigga?

NO.

  • How do you reconcile your opinion that gender doesn’t matter or even exist with your need to invent new genders each day?

Okay, pay close attention.

Gender is a gradient.

Gender shouldn’t be a point of discrimination or abuse.

It’s just that easy

  • In your version of equality, will white men ever have a voice in society, or will white men always be too privileged to participate in discussion?

OMFG, white men have had the floor since we’ve had floors. I’m sure they can sit on the bench at least for the next century or two and let the rest of us take the ball.

  •  What makes you think that the power of censorship that you are so desperately trying to establish now will at no point be used against you?

What is this censorship that is so concerning? Are you being silenced or something? Because you lot sure are talking and being listened to a whole bunch for being so oppressed and censored.

  • Why is it that if a woman dresses sexy or even topless in public, you support it, but if a female video game character is dressed sexy, then you want her clothed more modestly?

Why are you comparing fiction characters to real people? Real people decided what they want to wear, fiction characters can’t. And it’s not modest clothing most of us want: it’s functional clothes that make sense for the fucking character.

  • What is your favorite song to sing really loud when you’re confronted with a different point of view?
  • Why are you afraid of dissenting opinions? Your continued attempts to silence all oppositition by smearing them publicly or labelling their content as hate speech and having it removed only serves to insulate your bubble even more and maintain your echo chamber. It also prevents you from taking on new information. Different points of view that are sometimes superior to yours, which tends to happen whenever I (whoever this fuckmuppet is) talk?

I really should have saved the “Wanker” vid for this question.  

No one’s ‘afraid’ of your shitty opinion.  We just think it’s shit.  And boo hoo, you get called out for it? You poor baby.

  • What is reverse racism? Like, what the actual fuck is it? It’s just racism, right? <Insert the “crazy pill” line from Zoolander here because lol so funny>

Reverse racism isn’t a thing.  It’s a figment of the imaginations of whiny fucks like you who can’t handle letting someone else have a go at the wheel.

  • Do any of you people actually remember all the pronouns? You know the list, right? The one with 76 fucking genders?

I know this voice.

Undoomed, what’s your hang up about gender variations? This question and the one before about gender are from YOU, you faceless Slender wanna-be pisshole. 

But, for everyone else who might be wondering and is interested in an answer, the only pronouns you need remember are the ones someone tells you to us with them.  It’s really not that taxing.

  • Why do you feel entitled to control what artists and entertainers are allowed to express? Why do you think your sensibilities should be placed above the sensibilities of actual creators?

As a creator myself and as one yourself, we should both be aware that art is a dance between being oneself and maintaining an audience.  If you haven’t realized this already, what are you doing creating things for public consumption?

  • Have you ever considered that using the terms racism and sexism as haphazardly as you do to describe everything under the sun that makes you uncomfortable devalues the word to the point of actually hurting the people who actually suffer from real sexism and real racism? Have you ever fucking thought of that?

I would sure hate to know your definition of “real” sexism and racism.  Face it, pissy pants, racism and sexism is everywhere in our culture and we’re gonna call it out when we see it and try to do something about it.

  • Have you guys tried drinking this shit? <bleach> It’s great.

Sounds heavenly. It would only be polite to offer you a few sips first.

In conclusion, YouTube anti-SJWs, or at least the ones here, are a pack of asses sad in their pants about the world no longer conforming to their preferences and considering the opinions of others.

In other words, exactly what I thought they would be.

Now if you’ll excuse me, my temple has a date with a soldering iron.

{advertisement}
A Bunch of Snarky Answers to “Questions from White Men to SJWs”
{advertisement}
The Bolingbrook Babbler:  The unbelievable truth is now at freethoughtblogs.com/babbler

39 thoughts on “A Bunch of Snarky Answers to “Questions from White Men to SJWs”

  1. 1

    Those aren’t questions. Those are accusations. When you ask a question you want an answer. They don’t want answers. If they did, they wouldn’t have integrated what they want to hear into those statements.

  2. 2

    Do you actually imagine that you will be able to stretch out your adolescence for your entire existence?

    Well, it’s working for you, so…

  3. 4

    I only found this by googling for answers for the questions. Honestly, I just wanted to see if anyone actually answered any of them. I also only made this account to respond to this.

    Firstly, the video you talked about only answers around 12 of the questions, the rest he either dodges, or refuses to answer because it’s not applicable. But that’s not the point I’m trying to make, here. The point is that I think you’re misunderstanding most of these questions, or that the questions aren’t fully explained in the video, and beg explanation, before they can even be answered in the first place. As someone in the community the questions came from, I feel like I can explain them, so that you can actually put forth better answers that address the points of the questions. Also, I’ll put in my own responses to some of your answers, here and there. And, no, the questions aren’t accusations, they’re specifically directed at a certain subsection of feminists, especially prominent on tumblr, that this group refers to, specifically, as SJWs. I’ll be explaining more on that topic, eventually, so bear with me, ’till then. I’ll be listing the answers you gave to the questions in the order you rote them in, and leaving out the ones I either can’t explain or found that you answered adequately, whether I agree with them or not, to keep this at least kind of short. I’ll also be giving no sources, simply because I’m lazy, but at least I admitted it.

    Question 2:
    Well, as an LGBT ethnic minority woman, I remember that we’re not the Borg and aren’t going to agree on everything. I speak for me and others like me (unless and until they want to speak for themselves). You don’t think all SJWs are white women, do you?

    This question is one of the many that probably aren’t aimed at you, since you don’t seem to fall into the category the questions are supposed to be posed to. But, the people this question does refer to are the same people who see a picture of a woman holding up a sign that reads “I don’t need feminism because: …” and immediately call her a bigot, and claim she has internalized misogyny, and often harass and bully them.

    Question 4:
    Personally, I melt into a puddle. An SJPubble-ewe to be exact. Do you honestly have no idea what a safe space even means? You and your fellows are in one of your own right now in this video. What do you think will happen if you left yours?

    The safe space you claim they’re in doesn’t really exist. A safe space, as far as I understand it, is a place where opposing opinions and ideas to ones own aren’t allowed. The people in the video, at least the ones I watch and subscribe to, actually encourage opposing opinions be shared. They may be rude about it, but they will often open a debate, if one is offered. Granted, the raving fans may harass and belittle them, while doing so, but that’s just a youtube comments section problem. They can’t control what their fans do, after all.

    Question 7:
    Whenever you decide to give all of those “caring about people who aren’t like you” things a try. Don’t you worry, I won’t hold my breath.

    This isn’t an answer, for one, and neither is telling them to look something up. “Educate yourself” will never be a useful response. Activism is supposed to be all about educating others. Also, this question is another that seems N/A to you. It’s addressed to the tumblrinas (god, I hate that word) who come up with random genders like “toaster” and present it as a valid identity, or otherkin, or so forth and so on.

    Question 8:
    I’m sorry, is your Google broken? Seek and ye shall find, lazy.

    What… What exactly is to be googled, here? The 13% more women in college? Because that’s demonstrably true. Male only scholarships? Because there aren’t NEARLY as many of those as there are for women, black, mexican, etc, gay, lesbian, etc, etc. Also, the constant stream of “educate yourself” doesn’t work as an answer, here, either. I’ll stop mentioning it, because I don’t want to get repetitive, since you use this “answer” quite a lot.

    Question 9:
    Because fucksticks like you are scared of lady cooties, so you have this word that you can use while doing, as Logan pointed out in his video, fuck all.

    On top of not being an answer, it seems you don’t understand egalitarianism. Look, I know nothing about you, but the majority of feminists have never done anything to benefit the community, much less to benefit women. It would only make sense for the same to be true of egalitarianism, especially since it’s a relatively small community. And most egalitarians aren’t egalitarian because they’re “afraid of lady cooties,” but because, while they agree with the core concepts of feminism (and the MRM, for that matter, since both ideologies stand for essentially the same thing), but don’t want to be under the same label as people who literally want to sterilize or kill most if not all men. It only makes it worse that third wave feminism has become regressive.

    Question 10:
    What do you hope to gain by lying through your teeth? What segregation? Was there an explanation TJ edited out or was that your whole question?

    The explanation that was left out is as follows:
    It’s not segregation, by name, but it has the same implications. All whites must be separated from all blacks, who both must be separated from all hispanics – who must be further separated from latinos – , who must all be separated from etc, etc. This is the core foundation of “cultural appropriation.” It’s like not letting the food on your plate touch, but with cultures. Under the idea of cultural appropriation being a bad thing, cultures are never able to be shared, celebrated, or even learned about. If there’s no mixing of culture, there’s no understanding of it. Not letting cultures mix means that they’ll never evolve, never change, never become better than they are. It’s quite similar to language, actually. There’s a name for languages that haven’t changed and evolved; that haven’t taken words or been influenced by other languages; for thousands of years. These are called dead languages.

    Question 11:
    Also, YES ALL NAZIS.

    I don’t have much of a problem with your answer, other than this one line. There’s something about this that infuriates me. I had a great grandfather who served in WWII, on the German side. They were, technically, NAZIs, but they did not believe in what NAZI Germany was doing. They refused to serve in the military, in fact. What happened next is that a NAZI soldier put a gun to my great grandfather’s wife’s head, with their child in the room, and said, essentially, “join, or she dies, and your kid’s next.” So, no, not all NAZIs.

    Question 12:
    And from the looks of things, some of y’all refuse to work to UNlearn that shit.

    This isn’t an answer, it’s a deflection. You dodged the question, and refused to address the central point of it, instead opting to baselessly insult the cast of the video.

    Question 14:
    Right. I like being right so much that being called out as wrong makes me want to set my knowledge right ASAP. Also, isn’t describing who you are being real? Should I describe someone who isn’t me. That’s way not awesome.

    This probably isn’t directed at you.

    Question 15:
    If a drunk man and a drunk woman are fucking each other – whatever, have fun. If either one of them didn’t agree to fucking, then it’s rape. What is this with the weird “two blackout drunks fucking” scenarios?

    This keeps being brought up because it’s a go-to feminist argument that if a woman is drunk, it’s always rape. In fact, there was a famous (or infamous, rather) poster a college put up that told you whether it was rape, or not. It went something like “Are both sober? You’re all good. Is she drunk, and he isn’t? It’s rape Is he drunk and she isn’t? You’re all good. Are they both drunk? It’s rape.” Personally, I believe it should be handled similarly to drunk driving. Sure, you had the idea to drive drunk after you got drunk, but you got yourself drunk, so it’s still your fault. Sure, you only had sex with the guy because you were drunk, but you got yourself drunk, so it’s still your fault. And obvious exception for someone who’s actually passed out, and someone else commits sex acts on them. So, maybe it’s not applicable to your ideology, but it is to mainstream feminism.

    Question 17:
    NO.

    Why not? Sure, it was a simple yes/no question, but that doesn’t mean you can’t explain yourself.

    Question 18:
    Okay, pay close attention. Gender is a gradient. Gender shouldn’t be a point of discrimination or abuse.

    This, again, wasn’t really aimed at you. More so at the people who feel the need to make an arbitrary gender (remember toaster?), as well as pronouns to match, like zir, xir, etc. They simultaneously believe that gender should be abolished, and that not only are gender roles a social construct, but that gender, itself, is, despite there being obvious differences in musculature, hormones, genitalia, etc.

    Question 19:
    OMFG, white men have had the floor since we’ve had floors. I’m sure they can sit on the bench at least for the next century or two and let the rest of us take the ball.

    Okay, to be honest, this is the one I was itching to get at the most, for some reason. This question is not talking about the present, the past, or even the future. It’s asking about your own, personal utopia, where everything and everyone is equal in every conceivable way. No more systematic oppression, no disabilities, nor mental retardations. Men and women are somehow have equal strength, getting kicked in the nuts and giving birth no longer hurts, you know the drill. Hell, we’ll even through in no sickness just for shits and giggles. In this world, where everyone holds an equal percent of the population, where there are no minorities, nor discrimination of minorities or any other groups, would cis, straight, white men have a voice in society, or would they just be censored and silenced? Again, this world has nothing to do with ours. All of the past transgressions like slavery, and the like, have all been forgotten, and have no social hold over.

    Question 20:
    What is this censorship that is so concerning? Are you being silenced or something? Because you lot sure are talking and being listened to a whole bunch for being so oppressed and censored.

    The censorship isn’t evident? What about the rallies against the MRM meetings held by feminists? What about that one guy who wanted to open up the first male rape survivor shelter, who got harassed to the point of suicide? What about telling all white people to “shut up and listen?” What about the very term “mansplaining?” Do you live under or in that rock of yours? All of these things are a form of attempted censorship. They are people trying to silence things they disagree with.

    Question 22:
    No one’s ‘afraid’ of your shitty opinion. We just think it’s shit. And boo hoo, you get called out for it? You poor baby.

    He’s talking about the collective refusal to open a dialog with anyone who disagrees with you. In other words, safe spaces.

    Question 23:
    Reverse racism isn’t a thing. It’s a figment of the imaginations of whiny fucks like you who can’t handle letting someone else have a go at the wheel.

    On some point, we have common ground here. Reverse racism doesn’t exist. It’s just racism. I’m not talking about systematic racism, which does exist to a point, I’ll admit, but individual racism. This is basically the point that AS is making, here. It’s a bit of an in joke in the community.

    Question 24:
    But, for everyone else who might be wondering and is interested in an answer, the only pronouns you need remember are the ones someone tells you to us with them. It’s really not that taxing.

    It is when you have a lot of friends with random pronouns like zir, xir, sweet, burger, and skel. I’m not just making those up, by the way. The utter randomness of this is entirely impossible to remember. Aside from that, and this has nothing to do with undoomed’s point, it’s basically asking someone to stop using proper grammar, which you’ve spent all of your life growing accustomed to, and forming habits with. Stopping yourself from saying he, him, himself, and his, and, instead saying some stupid shit like bun, bum, bunself, and buns just doesn’t sit well with a lot of people. Personally, I’ll go as far as “they.”

    Question 25:
    As a creator myself and as one yourself, we should both be aware that art is a dance between being oneself and maintaining an audience. If you haven’t realized this already, what are you doing creating things for public consumption?

    Being yourself can still maintain an audience. It seemed to work out fine for TAA. He’s a complete douche irl, and a complete douche on his channel. He’s just an honest one with an opinion that a lot of people agree with. Of course, it helps that he’s quite charismatic. It seems to me that you’ve framed your answer to not only dodge the question, but to make your position seem more complex than it really is, when, in reality, you just want to form your opinion in such a way that people won’t call you out on it, and if they do, then you can feign nuance. This isn’t a shot against you, it’s a perfectly valid way of going about it. It’s just that I find it more than a bit dishonest. But, the question has nothing to do with any of this. The question hinges on why you think it’s acceptable to censor, or otherwise take away from or lessen, what someone creates, using their right to free speech, just because it’s offensive?

    Question 26:
    I would sure hate to know your definition of “real” sexism and racism. Face it, pissy pants, racism and sexism is everywhere in our culture and we’re gonna call it out when we see it and try to do something about it.

    Yeah, no. Real sexism is sharia law; orthodox Islam, Judaism, and Christianit; I could go on. The truth is that we do NOT live in a rape culture. Rape is seen by almost EVERY man as one of the MOST despicable things one could do. It’ll usually result in a good shaking in prison, especially if it was pedophilia. The “women are doubted whenever they say they were raped” is because of innocent until proven guilty. If you don’t understand this, then I’ll put it this way: you raped me. That means you get shipped off to prison, now, because you’re guilty until proven innocent. And, even so, just being accused or rape is enough to ruin your life – it’ll follow you for the rest of your life, you’ll never find a decent job, your SO might leave you, your friends might leave you, your whole life could fall apart in the blink of an eye, just because someone wanted to accuse you. And real racism is slavery, apartheid, lynching, threats, etc. It can be done to or for any race, including white people. The whole world isn’t America, there are countries in which whites are the minority, and are discriminated against. I’ll give you that racism does still exist in the western world, but not at the level you describe. Not at the level of being an abomination to the entire human race. It will never end completely, and neither will sexism, because the right to free speech protects it, and I’d much rather live with that than in a world where free speech is no longer a right. So, while I don’t agree with racism, or any prejudice, I’d rather that than the alternative.

    I went off in a tangent at the end, there, sorry.

    1. 4.1

      I’m not sure if I’m yawning because I’ve just got out of bed or because of your response. So I’m gonna just pick and choose what I want to address right now.

      Right off the bat, the second someone tries to bring up Tumblr in the way you have, my eyes roll. Tumblr is a social media program, not the place were things people don’t like come from. This current wave of feminism didn’t spring forth from the site; it’s always existed. Hell, even I have a Tumblr, so who knows, maybe they are referring to me. It’s a shitty shorthand for “people who care about stuff I don’t care about or find funny” or whatever. Also, the concepts some of them are whining about, like “safe spaces” and the gender spectrum, existed before Tumblr was even a thing, so you’re wrong. Sorry.

      Okay, that’s out of the way, now to your responses to my responses, or some of them anyway:

      You’re making more assumptions about their intent then I was, for starters. Question 2 doesn’t specify anything, so I answered it on its face, because it’s the same “not your shield” BS. Also, I agree that harassing people is wrong; maybe this lot and their followers should attempt to NOT do that to feminists and SJWs as well.

      For Question 4, allow me to explain what a safe space is: A place, forum, or group where people can connect with others without being bugged by the same obnoxious questions, sealioning, trolling, etc. Damn near every ‘side’ has a safe space somewhere, whether it’s backchannel or a forum or even a Facebook account (mine is friendslocked and this blog is strictly moderated just for that reason: The moment someone comes up with a new anti-SJW point, I’ll listen. It just hasn’t happened yet and I don’t want to deal with repetitious bullshit unless I’m mocking it). Complaining about other’s safe spaces makes about as much sense as complaining that you can just walk into someone’s house and yell your opinion. Get it now?

      Question 7 is snark. Did you read the title of this post? There are people who have taken these questions seriously; I’m not one of them.

      So is question 8. Dusty asked what about men only scholarships; I found a bunch of links in seconds with Google. So either he’s being disingenuous or never bothered looking shit up.

      Question 9:

      On top of not being an answer, it seems you don’t understand egalitarianism. Look, I know nothing about you, but the majority of feminists have never done anything to benefit the community, much less to benefit women.

      Again, snark and boy or boy I needed this laugh this morning. That is rich coming from caping for a group of white men who do nothing by complain on YouTube. I’ll leave you to study your history on the things feminism has given us as a society; I’m not a teacher.

      …seriously, did you read the title of this post. Most of my answers are flippant on purpose. I refuse to take their “questions” seriously because none of them are serious questions. But I digress.

      Question 10: You have a very lousy understanding of what “cultual appropriation” even means if you or the questioner liken it to segregation. Next.

      Question 11: Whatever. Nazis suck. I didn’t claim all Germans were. Next.

      Question 12: IS an answer. You simply disagree with it. Hell, it’s probably one of the most sincere answers I gave in this post.

      Question 14: You don’t know who it’s directed to either, but I’m going to take “questions for SJWs” as questions for SJWs like myself. Next.

      Question 15 is skipped because holy rape apology, Batman. Do not press this issue or you’re getting the fucking boot. I don’t tolerate that shit here.

      Question 17: See the little line under the NO. It’s a link to a post I wrote explaining my view in many many words.

      Question 18: Given that acknowledging other folk’s gender and gender expression isn’t a problem for me and a lot of ‘mainstream feminists”, you think this questions just might apply to me? Especially since I have genderqueer friends and fellow bloggers right here on The Orbit?

      Question 19:

      mental retardations

      First, nope. Ableist terms are not allowed here and no, I won’t be arguing that with you. Try it and be shown the door.
      Anyway, what kind of fantasy land is this were there are no disabilities or differences in gender and everything is lollipops and gumdrops? We simply want a world where we acknowledge differences, but everyone is given an equal chance to succeed in life. Period.

      Question 20: Oh dear, I don’t know where you got your definition of censorship from, but you need to get a refund (<—that is snark, by the way). None of your examples takes away the right for anyone to speak. Yes, even "shut up and listen", which doesn't mean "shut up forever". Also, using someone's suicide as a point for censorship is the shittiest of the shitty, and still not censorship.

      Question 22: No one owes anyone a discussion. That isn't fear, that's deciding how you want to spend your time. I could have just deleted this entire comment if I didn't feel like responding. That's not my fear, it would have been my boredom with the same tired nonsense you're spewing. Nothing you are saying is new information, just the same debunk with a quick Google search junk.

      So why am I allowing this to go through and even respond? Because I choose to. That isn't bravery, either. It's "It's 6 something in the morning and I'm not hungry enough to go make breakfast yet".

      Question 23: Worst. In joke. Ever.

      Question 24: Wah, wah, people use different words for themselves, it's so weird. So? If I changed my name to Mary, anyone still insisting on calling me "Niki" anyway is an asshole. Same with pronouns. Use them, remember them, apologize if you fuck up. It's only complicated because others like your are making it so. It's really not that hard.

      Question 25: Again, so what? TAA's found his audience and has enough of it that he can ignore anyone who criticizes him (granted sometimes he chooses not to, but again it his choice). We all have that option. And as consumers, we have the option to complain and criticism a product. That isn't entitlement, that's the right of a consumer. It's then the right of the creator to acknowledge or ignore. Again, not that hard of a concept, really.

      Question 26: *Yawn* More talking point bullshit. Your tangent might just put me back to sleep. Apology for choosing my blog to spew all of this shit not accepted.

    2. 4.2

      @thrownaway

      Honestly, I just wanted to see if anyone actually answered any of them.
      [..]
      The point is that I think you’re misunderstanding most of these questions, or that the questions aren’t fully explained in the video, and beg explanation, before they can even be answered in the first place. As someone in the community the questions came from, I feel like I can explain them, so that you can actually put forth better answers that address the points of the questions.

      I did a video doing just that – taking the most charitable interpretation of what the “questions” could be inferred to mean and then seriously answering / explaining here. Hope you don’t mind my posting the link here, Niki, but I just feel sometimes it’s up to us white men to educate ourselves and one another on the basics of the issues. Loved your snarky responses of course.

      =8)-DX

      1. Hope you don’t mind my posting the link here, Niki, but I just feel sometimes it’s up to us white men to educate ourselves and one another on the basics of the issues.

        hmmm.
        I’ll allow it.

  4. 5

    I wanna like the shit out if your article. I run a dad’s group, and “egalitarianism” comes up often. Just a way for doods to ignore their own shit and pour it out there. A little thing we SJW’s call, privilege.

    Also, I own being an SJW. It looks good on me

  5. 7

    This is reason why there need to be safe spaces.
    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/04/cbc-racist-comment-section-canada-prejudice-indigenous-people

    This pattern is repeated for every disadvantaged group. Until the people whining about “lack of debate” and “opinions aren’t allowed” do work to prevent people from acting like social predators, and actually show that they can listen to the the voices that are most relevant to problems like racism and sexism, this white male gives no shits.

    1. 7.1

      “Safe spaces” are seen by the privileged as a limitation on their rights to say what they want when and where they want to whomever they want.

      They are correct. What they refuse to understand is that the unprivileged cannot say what they want without fearing some form of retribution. When there is an asymmetry in power, there must be an asymmetry in protection, else we will always have the society we currently have, and our current society sucks for those at the bottom.

  6. 8

    It’s rather funny how you have written your article, and your replies. Some things you say outright make no sense, and if you did research would be clarified.

    So, first of all, dumb feminists, which I assume you fit in, under the name of BuzzFeed made a video, which was 36 questions for men or something dumb like that. That is what this video is parodying. That is why they are accusations, and some of it is vague etc, it’s because the video in which this was based off of. Also, your answers make no sense. A lot of them are also wrong. In fact, let me respond to some of your answers.

    Reply:…”Whut? I don’t know how the jump from “political correctness” to “Islam” was made, but give this guy a fucking medal. Every ‘rape culture’ is true ‘rape culture’ and singling out Islam does nothing but hide your denial that such a thing exists here.”
    I honestly do not understand the context of the question. I have been new to the Amazing Athiests channel, so I do not understand it, and rape culture does not exist. I know that your probably some spoiled idiot, but believe it or not, Google is your friend, and I am not, which is pretty ironic considering you tell them to do research when you can’t yourself. Give me one good MODERN society example, in which you may state that it exists as a culture. Also, you cannot give me a person. A person, or group of people, is not a culture, so give me one good actual example of this, “Rape culture” in the western society.

    Reply two: “Well, as an LGBT ethnic minority woman, I remember that we’re not the Borg and aren’t going to agree on everything. I speak for me and others like me (unless and until they want to speak for themselves). You don’t think all SJWs are white women, do you?”
    This question does not apply to you. Plain and simple. If you are LGBT, you cannot be a heterosexual woman who harasses LGBT, though I do believe they are wrong and that feminists are only bad to anti-feminist women, and not LGBT.

    Reply three: “Hey, dude from the first question, here’s an example of rape culture that’s a world and religion- wide thing.
    *ahem* We are not asking to be a protected class just because blaming the victim for not doing whatever you think should be ‘enough’ to prevent rape. Oh, and we still want to be treated as equal to men. Those can happen at the same time. They ought to be.”
    First of all, you claimed that what the first person said, made no sense. How could one give an example of which they do not get? Also, that has nothing to do with rape. This is what the first guy was talking about in a way; You’re claiming that anything said about protection is rape. It cannot be a simple logical reasoning of, “Oh hey, he’s not talking about rape whatsoever!”? I thought it was simple to tell that he had meant, that feminists still think women should be completely protected by men, and not fend for themselves like fucktards, unless it’s convenient for said fucktard. That is not equality. This is almost funny. Feminists say shit like that as a back holder for, “I have no answer, rape culture!” And, in the way you processed it, your answer becomes even worse, because that’s not even fucking happening ANYWHERE. Not only this, but women have better fucking cases than men! But then again, since you are an illogical thinker, and believe it is irrelevant, and think that male rape doesn’t even exist.

    If you are able to logically answer any of those answers, I will speak of more of your replies, but I do not want to waste the morning away. So that is my challenge to you. Try to answer logically.

    1. 8.1

      If you are able to logically answer any of those answers, I will speak of more of your replies, but I do not want to waste the morning away. So that is my challenge to you. Try to answer logically.

      No.

  7. 9

    Youtube keeps “suggesting” those clowns’ videos. Do they think every atheist would want to watch that crap?

    One thing that really bugs me is their misuse of other people’s or businesses videos. The stills shown are all images stolen from others’ videos, and people may end up watching something disgusting if they’re not paying attention. (Far right groups intentionally choose acronyms similar to legitimate organizations to fool people, e.g. ACLJ, NOM, AFA).

    Such misrepresentation not only gives the scum clicks and ad revenue, it diminishes or tarnishes the value of those whose work they abuse. I’ve sent reports to buzzfeed and others to say how their videos are misused, but I can’t take action for them other than report the slime and their accounts to youtube.

  8. 10

    Chucklefucks like the fool @8 are almost amusing. If not for the fact that they are die-hard Status Quo Warriors who do not want society to change for the better, I’d almost laugh at the asshat.

  9. 11

    “Rape is illegal and it hasn’t stopped happening and too many victims (of all genders) don’t get justice.”

    What the hell is justice? What good does it do? It leaves the murder victim as dead, the rape victim as raped, the molested child as molested, the robbery victim as robbed.

    In my world, there is punishment to deter future anti-social behavior by the perpetrator, there is punishment to deter future anti-social behavior by those who might follow in the perpetrator’s footsteps, and there is punishment as vengeance. Our justice system seems to focus on vengeance.

    I’m all for deterring future crime, not so much for vengeance. Too often it has led to tit-for-tat violence. If you want to reduce rape along with all forms of violence, the “debt to society” justice model has proven to be a big failure. Punishment as deterrence, along with education, social training, perhaps modeled along South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission would be worth trying. The one thing that won’t work is to continue raising angry men, entitled men, locking them up for short periods, them releasing them no better, just angrier.

    1. 11.1

      You may find this surprising, but I agree with you. Justice in my eyes would be taking the perp away from the public and working with them on how to not be a piece of garbage. If they can’t or won’t accept the work, then incarceration (with a serious re-haul of that system) would be a next step.

      Okay, agreed except for this part:

      It leaves the murder victim as dead, the rape victim as raped, the molested child as molested, the robbery victim as robbed.

      As a victim of sexual assault and rape, fuck this. I would LOVE to know that the men who did their crimes to me were at least made to answer for those crimes. THAT’S what justice means to me.

  10. 12

    As a victim of sexual assault and rape, fuck this. I would LOVE to know that the men who did their crimes to me were at least made to answer for those crimes. THAT’S what justice means to me.

    No problem there, but answering for the crime should also leave them or society or both better. If we can’t change the perp so the rest of us are safe with him among us, perhaps he shouldn’t ever be among us. Just doing time isn’t enough. As bad as one rape is, a repeat performance that could have been avoided is so much worse.

    Love your work. Agree or disagree, you make me think, you make me struggle to see another view. Thanks.

  11. 13

    So, are you going to now ignore Armoured Skeptic’s reply to you? Because he trounces your arguments. Or are you now “too bored or disinterested” since they actually beat you. Too lazy when you’re beaten.

    1. 13.1

      I’m only letting this through because it’s funny and I guess I should say something about my silence while I’m being “trounced” (HA!).

      None of those gents are worth a serious response, so I’m not wasting my time and energy on a “debate”. They’re only good for mocking and snarking.

      So please take this “ooooh, you gonna let so-and-so talk about you like that?” playground fight mentality somewhere else, please thank you.

      1. You realize the only way to prove your ideas have merit is to actually have debate and discourse, correct? That’s why the most intelligent minds in our society do such. it works. To openly admit you won’t debate people proves you have no faith in your arguments. Please stop hiding behind a veil of “laziness” when you clearly have enough time to blog.

        1. Let me break something down to you and the rest of the folks angling for some sort of “response” war:
          I
          Don’t
          Give
          A
          Shit

          You can call it laziness until the cows come home, I don’t care. Who are y’all to demand more of my time and energy than I’m willing to give?
          You don’t think my “ideas” have merit? You think I’m not very intelligent because I admit that I am not a good debater? So the fuck what?

          Oh and by the way, I trashed your other comment because it was garbage.

  12. 15

    Seriously, fuck you.

    #NotallMuslims, but YES ALL NAZIS?!

    Because grunt foot-soldiers had a choice, cause you know…a dictatorship? People either joined the cause or their family plus themselves be killed. Period. But I guess you couldn’t understand being forced to join a cause you don’t believe in to keep you wife, son, daughter, etc. alive and well, you get to sit on your ass blogging about how “da man” keeps you down when it’s actually your lard-ass along with an astoundingly low I.Q. that REALLY keeps you down.

    So one more time…just to make it clear, fuck you.

    1. 15.1

      *does the Dance of the Sugar Plum Middle Fingers and By The Way Blocked*

      Also, ‘lard-ass’? Can’t y’all get some new insults? I mean some shit I’ve never ever told myself, because this little tanty is just booooring.

  13. 16

    Watched the video, as well as read every single one of your painful responses, and quite a few of these pitiful followers you have. What the hell is wrong with you, my dear? As a Latino living in the deep south, I fear you’re more racist than half these rednecks that live around me. Your logic is ass backwards, and you didn’t even answer half of the questions! You talk about “fighting racism” without acknowledging your own racism. You don’t even have the self-awareness to acknowledge the hypocrisy that comes with being a SJW. Want a few examples?

    1) if you were truly fighting for equality, you would not recommend silencing white males for 2 FUCKING CENTURIES.
    2) If you think all nazis were bad, how can you possibly say that not all muslims are bad? Surely you do realize that some nazis were simply following orders, else they lose their lives, or their families. How can you sit here and say “i couldnt protest because of the bombs that i would never know were about to be dropped” when we never know when the next Islamic Extremist will blow something up?
    3) You’re NOT part of the LGBT spectrum. If you’re “asexual”, then you AREN’T LGBT!

    Your bio is you literally whining about different shit and saying “oh pity me plz” instead of mentioning ANYTHING about your own personality. It’s sad, really.

    I can’t even lock down one topic to talk about, you just horrify me.

    Grow a brain, please.

    1. 16.1

      Good grief, you’re boring, too. While nobody forced you to read me, or comment, allow me to show you the door. “You horrify me”…settle down, no need to get all dramatic over a snarky post now.

      Okay then, buhbye now.

  14. 18

    Your bio is you literally whining about different shit and saying “oh pity me plz” instead of mentioning ANYTHING about your own personality.

    yes. “geek”, “gamer”, “writes dirty novels”, “loves memes” etc. are exactly what whining looks like and are nothing at all even remotely like personal interests or insight into personality. brilliant criticism..

    1. 18.1

      I know, right.

      And yes, I allow comments about people I’ve blocked. Because if you don’t like getting shit on, don’t come here and attempt to shit on me.

      Unfair? Welcome to my blog.

  15. 19

    Look, I know nothing about you, but the majority of feminists have never done anything to benefit the community, much less to benefit women.

    Can you make up your mind?
    Are we: unfairly taking things away from boys and men, establishing a female supremacy or are totally useless?
    Apart from the many feminist policies that have become law in many countries, from, you know, voting rights to parental leave and constant work to increase paternal leave?

    I don’t have much of a problem with your answer, other than this one line. There’s something about this that infuriates me. I had a great grandfather who served in WWII, on the German side. They were, technically, NAZIs, but they did not believe in what NAZI Germany was doing. They refused to serve in the military, in fact. What happened next is that a NAZI soldier put a gun to my great grandfather’s wife’s head, with their child in the room, and said, essentially, “join, or she dies, and your kid’s next.” So, no, not all NAZIs.

    Funny thing, there’s a difference between a person living in Nazi Germany and even being a member of the Wehrmacht and a Nazi. Apart from that I’m calling bullshit on your story. Not because the Nazis weren’t horrible people who forced folks to fight for them, but because that was not their modus operandi.

    This isn’t an answer, for one, and neither is telling them to look something up. “Educate yourself” will never be a useful response. Activism is supposed to be all about educating others.

    No, that’s called “teaching” which is a paid profession.

    Male only scholarships? Because there aren’t NEARLY as many of those as there are for women, black, mexican, etc, gay, lesbian, etc, etc.

    I’D say that a “gay only” scholarship is by definition a male only scholarship and that roughly half of Mexicans are male as well. It’s interesting how you separate those people neatly from the “male” category.

    but don’t want to be under the same label as people who literally want to sterilize or kill most if not all men.

    Pics or it didn’t happen.
    Oh, right, it didn’t happen.

    All whites must be separated from all blacks, who both must be separated from all hispanics – who must be further separated from latinos

    Are you actually aware that “latino” and “hispanic” are hugely overlapping categories? Maybe you should try to learn the meaning of the words frist before you attempt to build your strawman?

    Also
    Feminists: We want diverse media production! Black women, Asian women, Latinas, white women! We want straight women, lesbians, bi women. We want trans women and cis women. We want them to interact with a diverse cast of men as people and not just love interests.

    You folks: Why do you want segregation???

    . This is the core foundation of “cultural appropriation.” It’s like not letting the food on your plate touch, but with cultures.

    Add “cultural appropriation” to the list of things you don’t know shit about.

    . In fact, there was a famous (or infamous, rather) poster a college put up that told you whether it was rape, or not. It went something like “Are both sober? You’re all good. Is she drunk, and he isn’t? It’s rape Is he drunk and she isn’t? You’re all good. Are they both drunk? It’s rape.”

    And you’ll show us a picture of that poster any minute now, right?

    What about that one guy who wanted to open up the first male rape survivor shelter, who got harassed to the point of suicide?

    See above.
    You’re making some very strong claims and you’Re not providing a shred of evidence.
    And now I’m bored as well

Comments are closed.