Comments on: Todd Starnes is reality challenged

By: cicely

cicely — Fri, 15 Aug 2014 03:11:24 +0000

And a quick look at the lower right-hand corner of my monitor tells me that I’m about to turn into a pumpkin (the only acceptable squash!), so with that, Good Night, Dear Shoop.
🙂

By: cicely

cicely — Fri, 15 Aug 2014 03:09:47 +0000

Dunno...what is the serious (as opposed to, appalled, or watching for comedic research purposes) viewership of Faux? *googling* From here: Primetime (Mon-Sun): 1,097,000 total viewers / 222,000 A25-54 Total Day Mon-Sun): 1,761,000 total viewers / 294,000 A25-54 though from here: "But that dominance was accompanied by an alarming demographic shift for the 21st Century Fox (FOXA +1.02%) network as thousands of viewers younger than 54 changed the channel. That may be giving some Fox News executives their own gray hairs. The network's median age has edged above 65 for six of the past eight years, The New York Times' Bill Carter reports. It's impossible to know exactly how old Fox News' audience is, because ratings company Nielsen doesn't provide an exact figure once viewers are older than 65. At the same time, viewers in the 25-to-54 age group have been dwindling. The network shed 11% of its younger viewers in the second quarter."

By: queershoop

queershoop — Fri, 15 Aug 2014 01:46:18 +0000

In reply to cicely. cicely: I wonder how many people soak in the BS spewed by the likes of Starnes.

By: cicely

cicely — Fri, 15 Aug 2014 01:44:28 +0000

Hypothesis: He’s there to “sell” a narrative. After all, Faux Nooz watchers must have their “reality” spoon-fed to them.

By: Daz

Daz — Fri, 15 Aug 2014 01:43:55 +0000

Why didn't Obama release a statement supporting the journalists who were attacked by the angry mob?

Well they were attacked by an angry mob. Right question, wrong target.