What could be worse than ACE, amirite? After that fuckery, BJU’s Earth Science Fourth Edition will be a breath of fresh air. I mean, A Beka’s Science of the Physical Creation wasn’t unmitigated horror, and Bob Jones University’s history books aren’t as frothing fundie as them, so this might not be utterly awful. One may even begin to believe this can be got through without undue damage to the liver.
Until we open to the first chapter.
And begin to wonder if the products of one vineyard will be enough.
I’m afraid this will be long, even though I’m splitting this chapter in two. Get comfy. Find a stress ball to squeeze and something to bite down on. Ready? Let’s go meet the BJU Science Dudes.
Yes, my darlings, in the ES4 universe, science is only done by bearded white dudes. And they haven’t got names. The guy in green, we are told, is a scientist. We’ll call him Mr. Green. He’s the secular scientist, who accepts the actual age of the earth. His, um, buddy in red – we’ll call him Mr. Red – is a scientist, too.
He loves God and the Bible, which he holds to be the only absolutely reliable source of truth. And because of this, he also loves what he does. He believes praising God through his discoveries and helping people to live better lives are his highest callings. He is certain the world is “young” and a special place because the Bible teaches us these things.
Oh, right. A “scientist.”
We are then informed that “people’s views affect how they see and study the world and the universe,” followed by a cartoon of Mr. Green and Mr. Red looking at Earth from orbit, and variously marveling how it’s a product of random chance/design. All of you who heard Ken Ham and company spew know where this is going.
We’re four paragraphs in, and I advise you now to buy stock in Columbia Valley vineyards specializing in Riesling grapes. You should also invest in the companies who make Captain Morgan and Malibu. This is going to take oceans of alcohol to endure.
Right. As we read more about what this book’s got in store, we learn that we’ll learn “how the earth was really designed for life.” Goody. We’re warned repeatedly to “stay on the path.” Don’t stray, kiddies – thar be atheists! They’ve “organized different kinds of information in special boxes,” which seems to be a fundie specialty. One bright spot is the promise to include the etymology of words “so that you can learn to decode similar words using common roots, prefixes, and suffixes.” That’s actually quite helpful. But they go and kill my buzz by having little boxes with a Bible icon “that give you practice explaining something from a biblical viewpoint.” And there will be info boxes on the climate change “debate.” I see we’re busy churning out far-right Godbots, then. Blatantly.
It turns out that review questions that “really challenge your thinking” or “require outside research to answer” are optional. Of course. Mustn’t encourage the kiddies to look too diligently for answers.
And, after hoping “that your faith in God’s truths will be greatly strengthened when you come to the end,” it’s on to Unit 1, which is introduced by “Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, Chemist and Creationist.” Who tells us all about logic, reason, and the Bible (“the Christian’s final authority,” doncha know). And how it just makes sense to accept the Bible as absolute truth. Also, the Earth is young. And we know Dr. Jonathan Sarfati is a really-real scientist because he is a bearded white dude, so we can trust him.
Is anyone else wondering if Ken Ham lifted his entire side of the Nye-Ham debate from this book?
Take a drink. Another drink. Turn the page…
For two refreshing paragraphs, we are not pounded over the head with God. We meet a little girl who saved people from the Boxing Day Tsunami by remembering a geography lesson about tsunamis and getting people to high ground at the first sign of this one. Cling to this. It is the last bit of God-neutral stuff for a long while.
We learn next that we should learn Earth science because Genesis (dominion over the earth and all that): the Creation Mandate. Also, made in God’s image. And, flat-out:
“So we need to engage in dominion in a way that helps other people because people are important to God, and they should be to us, too.”
Jesus said so (Mark 12:30, Deut. 6:5, Mark 12:31, Lev. 19:18). Four paragraphs in to Unit 1, and we already have six times the Bible citations as SPC.
Then we’re told we do science to declare God’s Glory (Rom. 11:36), too.
So how can humans declare God’s glory in earth science?
Discovery and imitation. Earth science is a wonderful tool of discovery. As we study cave formations, lightning, ocean currents, and nebulas, we learn about God through what He’s created. This gives us a sense of awe and wonder that helps us glorify Him.
This isn’t the introduction to an Earth science textbook. It’s a bloody sermon.
Then they babble on about how when we make stuff, we’re imitating God, and how all this is totes worshiping God, which has very nearly put me off doing anything ever again. Talk about laying it on thick. And every single caption on this page is full of more of the same. F’rinstance, on a photo of a street devastated by an earthquake, we’re told earthquakes “remind us that we live in a fallen, dangerous world.” Section 1.3 expands on that, moaning that dominion ain’t easy in this fallen world. Because Adam fucked it all up, “everything you will study this year is cursed and broken.” We’re born sinners, baby, and “can’t see the earth as it should have been.” But, baby, there’s God’s redemption. And we “should see earth science as part of God’s ongoing work of redemption – restoring people to the work of biblical dominion.”
It’s now that I flip back a page to confirm this chapter is, indeed, called “The World of Earth Science” and not “Pastor Bob’s Searing Sermon on Bible Stuff, With a Few Nods to the Notion of Earth Science, Cuz It Sounds All Smart That Way.”
We next learn about all the preaching and healing Jesus’s disciples did, and how Christianity spread over the whole world, and how earth science lets us be just like ’em. But you don’t help people by predicting tsunamis and providing clean water just because it’s the right thing to do, nossir. It’s because
If Christians do this with love and concern, they can show others – the people they work with or the people who benefit from their labors – that Christianity is no storybook fable. It is real. Jesus has redeemed their lives, and He wants to redeem the lives of many other people, too.
It’s starting to feel like a punch card that’ll get Jesus a free coffee after so many people redeemed, or one of those green stamps we used to get with our grocery purchase, that we could paste to little cards and redeem for housewares when we had so many cards filled. Earth science, I’m not feeling.
Then we’re on to Redeeming the Mind, in which we are told God “redeems people from a guilty conscience (Heb. 10:22) and a sinful way of life (1 Pet. 1:18). But He also redeems His people from wrong thinking.” We’ve gotta “think the way Christ would have” us think. And, we’re told, “Wrong thinking is easy to spot in earth science.” Check out the chica in fig 1-7, who foolishly thinks the fossil she’s working on “is many millions of years old. But does her belief agree with God’s thoughts?”
Yeah, that was totes earth science. And I’m the Queen of Atlantis. It’s true. Send me cash money.
Next week, we will be told how we’re supposed to approach earth science as Christians. Will my liver survive? Will my brain explode before the end of the chapter? Stay tuned!
7 thoughts on “Adventures in Christianist Earth Science Education IIb-1: In Which I Advise You to Buy Shares in Columbia Valley Vineyards”
I remember once composing some satire diagrams of this Human Reason vs. God’s Word contrast. One of them went:
Human Reason: ((mouse, bat), pigeon)
God’s Word: (mouse, (bat, pigeon))
The most sensible young-earth creationist that I know about was Philip Gosse, a contemporary of Charles Darwin. In 1857, he wrote a big tome, Omphalos, in which he argued that the Universe runs in cycles and that God had to create it in the middle of those cycles. Thus, Adam and Eve would have to have had navels, even though they had not grown in the usual way. The title of his book was the Greek word for navel. He applied his argument to oodles of seeming evidence of the Earth having great age, thus the size of his tome.
A present-day successor would write in similarly gory detail about radiometric dating, Milankovitch cycles, the distances of distant stars and galaxies, stellar evolution, and Big-Bang cosmology, and explain those in the same way: creation in the middle of cycles.
Despite Philip Gosse’s high hopes, his book was almost universally rejected. A certain Charles Kingsley could not “believe that God has written on the rocks one enormous and superfluous lie.” That is, divine fraudulence.
I think that for this task you need something better than Captain Morgan—surely only Pusser’s will do :-)
A bit too pricey for such wanton waste, no? :) Personally, I’d recommend something truly nasty for this voyage (don’t be fooled by the descriptive description, it’s all lies once you’ve taken the first sip!). Not for the weak-hearted, and a guaranteed complement to all the facepalming – like a headdesk for the innards.
As for the OP, well, yes, umm… Yeah. Yeeeeaaaaahhh…
yeesh. “wrong thinking”? Sounds like something from North Korea.
Wrong thinking makes Dear Leader sad.
Wrong thinking will make Dear Leader kill you.
and I think you need something more like Stroh 80 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stroh) to get through this drek.
I see Dana has many alcoholic adventures ahead! :D
Quality over quantity I would recommend as there must be some enjoyment from the experience. Cheap and nasty booze combined with these (intellectually) cheap and nasty books might just interact together and cause a really nasty downward spiral to nihilism and despair.
What about expensive nasty booze?
Comments are closed.