Return of the Welfare Queens: Feminism, Secularism, Anti-Racism

By Sikivu Hutchinson

The percentage of white feminists who are concerned about racism is still a minority of the movement, and even within this minority those who are personally sensitive and completely serious about formulating an activist challenge to racism are fewer still.  Barbara Smith, Home Girls: A Black Feminist Anthology

In the American imagination, Black women are the poster children for disreputable irresponsible motherhood and Latina “illegals” a close second.  From birth to adolescence every girl of color must navigate a political climate in which Ronald Reagan’s racist welfare queen caricature casts long shadows.  Ending its noble boycott of covering black women, the L.A. Times recently served up some red meat for welfare queen watchers.  The front page featured an extensive profile of 27 year-old Natalie Cole, a jobless unmarried unskilled black mother with four kids.  Entitled “Caught in the Cycle of Poverty” the article trots out an expert from Harvard who sagely proclaims that “poverty is bad for kids”; offering no further analysis on how the richest most militarized nation on the planet pimps out its children.  Instead, we are regaled with Cole’s hot mess of personal failure and pathology.  Coming from a long line of young single mothers, by the time she was 17 she was raising two children.  She can’t be bothered to do a résumé or use birth control to avoid having a fifth child.  The prayer “God in heaven, hear my prayer keep me in thy loving care” is taped to her bedroom wall.  Needless to say she will not be getting her Oxygen, TLC or Lifetime reality show any time soon.

The article was especially timely, tragic, and enraging because I recently found out that one of my most inquisitive students is pregnant at 16.  Several of my Women’s Leadership Project alums, who worked their asses off to become the first in their families to go to college, speak of friends that have had children shortly after graduating from high school.  As budding feminists they are overly familiar with the “validation” pregnancy supposedly provides working class young women of color inundated with media propaganda that hyper-sexualizes black and Latina bodies and demonizes abortion.

In this South Los Angeles school-community only a small fraction of the student body goes on to college and many youth are in foster care, often having to raise themselves.  Small evangelical store front churches grossly outnumber living wage job centers, God and Jesus are touted as some of the biggest “cultural” influences, and high teen pregnancy rates are a symptom of the expendability of “other people’s children” (to quote education activist Lisa Delpit).  Thirty years ago scoring a living wage job with benefits was still a possibility for a South L.A. teenager with only a high school diploma.  Now, having a college degree is the bare minimum for getting a decent paying job.  However the regime of mass incarceration has made the barriers to college-going even higher for youth of color.  One in six black men has been incarcerated and in some instances whites with criminal records elicit more favorable responses from employers than do black or Latino applicants with no records.  Mainstream media focus on the staggering unemployment rates of men of color has eclipsed attention to the economic downturn’s equally devastating impact on black women.  Deepening segregation, diminishing job prospects due to the gutting of public sector employment (23% of black women are employed in public sector jobs) and mental health crises have pushed more women of color into the church pews, or, alternative spirituality, with a vengeance.

So what does the intersection of non-theism and feminism mean within the context of the New Jim Crow? And what might secularist feminism mean for women of color when the vast majority of them still view feminism as a “white” thing, chronically disengaged from critical issues of economic justice? These were some of the issues I cared about coming into CFI’s first ever Women in Secularism conference.  The event was organized by DC CFI director Melody Hensley, who did an excellent job of bringing together a cross-section of writers, activists, and academics to discuss the politics of sexism, theocracy, women’s rights, and secular organizing. I was pleased to finally meet atheist feminists like novelist Alyson Miers, author of Charlinder’s Walk, Atlanta radio host Charone Pagett and writer Soraya Chemaly in person.  Nonetheless, the overwhelmingly white audience highlighted the quantum leap that remains in making humanism, secularism, and atheism culturally relevant to communities of color.

One of the highlights of the conference was Wafa Sultan, a physician, internationally renowned activist, and L.A. resident.  Sultan spoke movingly about her experiences with misogynist violence and repression in Syria, detailing her niece’s tragic suicide after enduring an abusive forced marriage.  Like the Bible, woman-hating is embedded in the very language and doctrine of the Koran (she alluded to most of the occupants of Islamic hell as being female).  Sultan insisted that if Americans can lob bombs and send drones to Middle Eastern countries they should certainly be allowed to develop secular schools there; an item that is clearly not high on America’s militarist agenda.  While powerfully condemning Islam, she sidestepped the issue of U.S. imperialism in the Middle East vis-à-vis how Western occupation has historically aggravated Muslim fundamentalism rather than spur secular movements and women’s rights in countries like Iran and Iraq.  She poignantly compared living under Islam to hell then proceeded to criticize American women for “complaining” about their civil rights (and ostensibly cozier existences).  Her dismissal was jarring in a nation in the throes of white Christian fascist/Tea Party/American Taliban backlash—which ape the very fundamentalist traditions white nationalists demonize in the “primitive” Middle East—against women’s rights, LGBT equality, undocumented immigrant rights, and economic justice.  Perhaps sensing the cognitive dissonance her scold elicited she circled back and expressed solidarity with American women at the end of her talk.

Sultan, Greta Christina, Annie Laurie Gaylor and Elizabeth Cornwell from the Richard Dawkins Foundation discussed the benefits and drawbacks of religion on a panel that delved into everything from anthropology 101 to organizing strategies.   Discussing the need to organize across political interests Greta gave props to the Secular Students Alliance, referencing the appeal of LGBT advocacy to younger activists seeking to coalition-build.  On the subject of why male non-believers greatly outnumber women non-believers in most societies, Cornwell stressed the gender specific needs of women vis-à-vis caregiving and childrearing.  She argued that women are effectively compelled to seek the social and community protections provided by organized religion.  Greta argued that men didn’t need the comforts of religion because they already enjoyed gender, race and class privileges in a stratified society.  Hence, women who break away from social and cultural conventions risk greater ostracism and moral stigma than do men (such as being labeled a slut/fallen woman or bad mother).

I spoke on a panel about the intersection of feminism and non-theism with fellow bloggers/writers Rebecca Watson, Jen McCreight and Ophelia Benson.  Having received a slew of Internet hate mail and rape threats, Watson called out male atheists who love to rail against Islamic patriarchy and female genital circumcision whilst paternalistically denying sexism in the New Atheist movement.  McCreight challenged the audience to push back against sexist exclusion of the views of women activists and writers who speak out on women’s rights and the politics of diversity.  But more than simple diversity radical intersectionality demands that the movement go beyond the canned mantra of religion versus science toward an anti-racist anti-sexist anti-heterosexist vision of secular social justice.

In her book Women in the Church of God in Christ Anthea Butler discusses how “church mothers” sought sanctification as a form of social agency within sexist Black Church hierarchies.  An alternative to ordination, sanctification allowed black women to “negotiate for and obtain power both within the denomination and without it…Church members pursued sanctification through…fasting, prayer, scripture study, and other disciplines, creating moral and spiritual authority.” In short, church mothers in COGIC created meaningful spaces to compensate for their exclusion from official channels of power and authority.   They also negotiated morality in a context in which Black women’s bodies were constructed as the criminal sexual racial other set against the backdrop of white innocence, reason, and Western civilization.  No Cinderella, Snow White, Rapunzel or Sleeping Beauty.  During the panel I framed this history vis-à-vis the explosion of fetal homicide, race-selection abortion, and other anti-family planning laws that disproportionately criminalize women of color as pathological breeders.  Despite being less than 9% of the U.S. population, black women are the largest segment of the skyrocketing female prison population.  Black children are six times more likely to have a parent or guardian in prison.  And colorism  plays a role in black female sentencing and incarceration rates as well.  According to a recent study done in North Carolina prisons dark-skinned black women were more likely to receive and serve longer sentences than lighter-skinned black women.  The War on Drugs, draconian Three Strikes laws, suspension and expulsion policies that fuel the school-to-prison pipeline and the gutting of the social welfare safety net have deepened black and Latino criminalization.

But these are not secular issues that are privileged in traditional humanist feminist discourse.  As labor activist Siobhan Brooks notes in her article “Black Feminism in Everyday Life,” “(my mother) did not relate to white feminism because the poverty of women like her was never an agenda for them.  I think largely the white mainstream feminist movement rarely considered issues of class regarding motherhood…Growing up I knew better than to get pregnant because of my mother’s warnings about how I would end up on welfare, like most of our female neighbors who were single mothers.  Many hadn’t completed their education.  My mother did not hold these views because she claimed to be feminist; she held these views because she knew firsthand the interlocking systems of racism, poverty, and sexism.” For Natalie Cole and all those “other people’s children,” humanist feminism has got to be down for this radical challenge.

Sikivu Hutchinson is the author of Moral Combat: Black Atheists, Gender Politics, and the Values Wars and the forthcoming Godless Americana: Race and Religious Rebels.


Return of the Welfare Queens: Feminism, Secularism, Anti-Racism

12 thoughts on “Return of the Welfare Queens: Feminism, Secularism, Anti-Racism

  1. 1

    The conference was amazing, though I, too, noticed the overwhelmingly white audience and found it a little worrisome. I thought it was a little odd when Dr. Sultan said that piece about how she doesn’t like to hear American women complain about our rights (or the insufficient status thereof) but she made more sense in telling us not to take our rights for granted, to keep on fighting.

    Your panel on Saturday morning was really interesting and engaging. I just wish I’d had more time to speak with you afterwards.

      1. I suspect that I could write out the top 20 comments practically verbatim without even visiting the site. I might be a little off on the particular racial slurs used, but after seeing a few dozen threads like that you want to scrub your brain out with sandpaper but also learn the comment patterns.
        You didn’t mention it above, but I’d bet that in that part of South Central L.A. non-payday loans are very hard to come by, and that this fact is equally not mentioned in the article. Availability of capital is something that’s vitally important to any kind of economic development, and has been systematically denied to people of color for decades. The apologists for systemic racism always ignores these facts in their rhetoric except when they’re attacking the CRA (which helped but didn’t do nearly enough). Particularly, I think that areas like that in the article would benefit immensely from programs like those of the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh, which provides capital loans and technical assistance to poor women so that they can start or expand businesses. It’s been a stunning success, although efforts to transplant it have run afoul of U.S. banking regulations. I should very much like to see some programs here in the States that similarly target loans and other technical assistance to women of color. This in addition to healthcare access, ending the drug war and related ‘tough on crime’ laws, rebuilding the social safety net etc, of course. I tend to consider those to be more or less givens in any discussion of poverty alleviation.

  2. 3

    Despite being less than 9% of the U.S. population, black women are the largest segment of the skyrocketing female prison population.

    Nice article, but I think this statement is very misleading. You cannot compare between two non-equivalent entities, viz: the US population (which includes men) and the “female” prison population.

    Very misleading, I hope this wasn’t intentional, just the need for a little statistics 101?

  3. 4

    Thanks for this, I really enjoyed reading your post. It was an eye opener. Although, I think there is a lot of reading I need to do now, as this is an issue I know so little about.

  4. 5

    I was wondering if you were familiar with recent studies that suggest that teen pregnancy is not a predictor of the future economic status of girls, but the economic status is a predictor of the decision to have children very young.

    “Our reading of the totality of evidence leads us to conclude that being on a low economic trajectory in life leads many teenage girls to have children while they are young and unmarried and that poor outcomes seen later in life (relative to teens who do not have children) are simply the continuation of the original low economic trajectory. That is, teen childbearing is explained by the low economic trajectory but is not an additional cause of later diffifi culties in life. Surprisingly, teen birth itself does not appear to have much direct economic consequence.”

    It can be found here:

    I admit I haven’t read the whole thing 🙂 Since you mentioned teen pregnancy in your post, I thought you might be interested in it.

  5. 6

    *** If Social Services are Enough, Apparently Your Mothers are Buying Your Groceries. ***

    Here’s a better break down:

    1 Adult & 1 Child

    Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) [5 yr Benefit Limit {NOT lifetime}]


    Participate in WorkFirst Program 32 hrs a wk. Includes attending all workshops, daily job search and application submission. Must check in daily.
    After 30 days, participants are required to “work” a job assigned by WorkFirst, usually at Local Govt or State Agency.

    Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) [used to be food stamps]


    OK, for a total of $752 mo. a participant must put in 128 hrs a month of ‘work”.

    That is $5.85 an hour.

    That is a good wage for a teenager living at home but for a Parent & Child it IS NOT a LIVABLE WAGE! (What State worker gets $5.85 an hr?)

    What about the necessary time to get trained and start a good job, there is not any, unless you want someone else to raise your child, (Ann Romney wouldn’t)

    Vote in Nov!

    Tricky Mitt Show US Your Papers!


    Lyin’ Ryan Had to Show U 10 Yrs of His Tax Returns!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *