They aren’t even windmills

I’d say that the antivax crew are tilting at windmills thinking they’re giants a la Don Quixote, but they can’t possibly have even correctly identified what they’re tilting at, for all the damage they’re doing to themselves in the process. It’s more like they’re tilting at the Great Wall of China that is reality, dashing themselves repeatedly against it and leaving themselves ever more broken and bloodied for each attempt.

Via my buddy Pickles, Reuters reports US courts have rejected another claim that vaccines are responsible for autism in a lawsuit brought by the Mead family seeking a fat payday restitution for their son William’s condition.

“The Meads believe that thimerosal-containing vaccines caused William’s regressive autism. As explained below, the undersigned finds that the Meads have not presented a scientifically sound theory,” Special Master George Hastings, a former tax claims expert at the Department of Justice, wrote in his ruling.

In February 2009, the court ruled against three families who claimed vaccines caused their children’s autism, saying they had been “misled by physicians who are guilty, in my view, of gross medical misjudgment”.
[…]
Supporters of the scientific community welcomed the ruling.

“It’s time to move forward and look for the real causes of autism,” said Alison Singer, president of the Autism Science Foundation. “There is not a bottomless pit of money with which to fund autism science. We have to use our scarce resources wisely.”

But advocates for the idea that vaccines are dangerous said they would not give up. “We hope that Congress will intervene in what is clearly a miscarriage of justice to vaccine-injured children,” said Jim Moody of the Coalition for Vaccine Safety.

“Damn the evidence, we have a pet theory and we’ll squander every cent of our scarce resources fighting this bogeyman instead of finding the actual cause of, and an actual treatment for, autism. Every time someone tells us we’re wrong and the evidence shows that we’re wrong and logic itself proves that we’re wrong, every time any of those things happen, is actually a miscarriage of justice! We just need to scream louder and get more powerful people on our side to get our way!”

And somehow parents of autistic children think these idiots — these anti-reality fearmongering crusaders — are on their side and bravely taking on an evil establishment. Why is it when the evidence is in, there are always people that cling to their beliefs despite said evidence totally decimating their positions? You know this ruling is *not* going to stop groups like Autism Speaks and the rest of the crew that have latched onto Wakefield’s moneymaking scheme. And this certainly won’t shut Jenny McCarthy up, despite her kid having probably never had autism to begin with. No matter how many times they dash themselves against the harsh cold stone that makes up reality, they’ll just keep on getting back up, getting back on their donkey and charging headlong.

It’s like this in every field of study, scientific or otherwise: theology and religion, evolution, the origin of the universe, climate change, vaccines, GM foods, politics, economics, et cetera, et cetera. Hell, there are still flat-earthers. I sometimes feel as though these people are declaring, outright, that all of us must intentionally ignore and/or destroy the evidence, because they have too much invested in their positions to admit they were wrong all along. I kind of wish they were saying it outright, because maybe then we might hear the end of such unscientific nonsense once and for all, once their unsound methodology is laid bare for the masses to see.

They aren’t even windmills
{advertisement}

Tron Legacy Trailer 2

Saw this during the previews when we watched Alice in Wonderland in 3D. Yes, this trailer is EPIC in 3D.

httpvhd://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwvhW0ulclA

But seriously, they’ve been hyping this since last year. And it’s only going to be out December 17th. That’s a hell of a lot of post-production. If this is anything short of amazing, there will be a lot of wailing and gnashing of teeth by fanboys like me.

Tron Legacy Trailer 2

The Edison Twins theme is stuck in my head

Since the internet exploded with a sudden wave of nostalgia for Corey Haim after he OD’d, I’ve had this little problem. See, he used to be a child actor in Canada before he broke into Hollywood, and one of the shows he acted in was one of my favorites as a kid. And ever since the news struck of his demise, I can’t get the theme song out of my damn head.

And now neither can you.

The Edison Twins theme is stuck in my head

Well that explains my Most Viewed list’s #1 entry.

From my stats for last month:

Top 20 of 328 Total Search Strings
# Hits Search String
1 246 17.01% formspring questions
2 126 8.71% good questions to ask on formspring
3 122 8.44% good formspring questions
4 101 6.98% formspring questions to ask
5 93 6.43% questions to ask on formspring
6 47 3.25% funny questions to ask on formspring
7 41 2.84% random formspring questions
8 37 2.56% good formspring questions to ask
9 26 1.80% good questions for formspring
10 22 1.52% questions for formspring
11 21 1.45% best formspring questions
12 16 1.11% funny things to ask on formspring
13 15 1.04% best questions to ask on formspring
14 14 0.97% interesting formspring questions
15 12 0.83% agnostic-
16 12 0.83% hexatron rogue
17 11 0.76% what are good questions to ask on formspring
18 9 0.62% butt-
19 9 0.62% zdenny
20 7 0.48% good questions to ask formspring

That’s just the top 20. What’s with all the Formspring? Somehow I’m the number one non-Formspring.me site for just about all those searches! Ah well, I’ll take what traffic I can get.

(Uh… “butt-“? Seriously?)

Well that explains my Most Viewed list’s #1 entry.

This is why sex ed is necessary

This article is absolutely unfathomable. I’m trying to find some way to blame Bill Clinton and his “definition of ‘is'”, but it goes well beyond that. WELL beyond.

A new study from the Kinsey Institute at Indiana University found that no uniform consensus existed when a representative sample of 18- to 96-year-olds was asked what the term meant to them.
[…]
The study involved responses from 486 Indiana residents who took part in a telephone survey conducted by the Center for Survey Research at IU. Participants, mostly heterosexual, were asked, “Would you say you ‘had sex’ with someone if the most intimate behavior you engaged in was …,” followed by 14 behaviorally specific items. Here are some of the results:

* Responses did not differ significantly overall for men and women. The study involved 204 men and 282 women.
* 95 percent of respondents would consider penile-vaginal intercourse (PVI) having had sex, but this rate drops to 89 percent if there is no ejaculation.
* 81 percent considered penile-anal intercourse having had sex, with the rate dropping to 77 percent for men in the youngest age group (18-29), 50 percent for men in the oldest age group (65 and up) and 67 percent for women in the oldest age group.
* 71 percent and 73 percent considered oral contact with a partner’s genitals (OG), either performing or receiving, as having had sex.
* Men in the youngest and oldest age groups were less likely to answer “yes” compared with the middle two age groups for when they performed OG.
* Significantly fewer men in the oldest age group answered “yes” for PVI (77 percent).

The only explanation for people not considering penis-in-vagina to “count” as sex, that I can think of, is education. Without teaching people what counts as sexual intercourse, STD infections are probably most rampant in segments of the population where people aren’t properly informed.

This is why sex ed is necessary

Adam Deen vs Dan Barker – Is God a Delusion?

The question and answer periods are always so awkward, so neither Jodi nor I really felt the need to watch them, but the debate itself was rather one-sided. Of course it always seems that way — theists always think their side handily won any such debate, while atheists likewise think the same thing. My reasoning for calling it one-sided is insofar as Barker actually adequately answered Deen’s claims (though not, as Deen seemed to think he should have, during the opening speech), while Deen did nothing of the sort, merely constructing several incorrect assumptions about Barker’s worldview.

I’ve noticed that quite often during debates — the theist side will make several claims about the atheist’s worldview in particular, even going so far as to outright refuse to acknowledge the atheist’s self-definition. I can’t recall a debate where an atheist tells a theist what the theist believes — only that their reason for believing what they claim to believe is wrong.

Adam Deen vs Dan Barker – Is God a Delusion?