Dudette, you’re getting a Della

Dell has apparently decided that their laptop lines could use a boost in sales — one that can only be achieved by slapping some powder-colored shells on them and marketing them to women as portable digital recipe books, on their new site called, I shit you not, “Della“.

della

Don’t worry though ladies, Dell has your technical issues covered with such hard-hitting “tech tips” as this:

3. Get moving: Tools like Gyminee help you track workouts and reach your fitness goals. You can even map out new running routes via sites like Map my run.

Yeah, they packaged in some fitness software to help you shed some pounds! There’s also a note at the top of the “tech tips” page stating that the page has changed recently due to user comments — I’m assuming because of the original tech tips list, as documented by the MSNBC article above:

the site’s “tech tips” includes a feature, “Seven Unexpected Ways a Netbook Can Change Your Life,” which starts out by saying, “Once you get beyond how cute they are, you’ll find that netbooks can do a lot more than check your e-mail.”

Among those uses: Finding recipes online (Wow! I didn’t know you could do that!), making “your mini … your meditation buddy as you take mini-breaks throughout your day (schedule them, with reminders, on your calendar),” and using a netbook “to track calories, carbs and protein with ease, watch online fitness videos, map your running routes and more.”

Okay, so you’re quietly scrubbing the sillier stuff, good on you Dell. That’s admitting you screwed this one up bigtime. What’ll REALLY turn this whole thing around is if you’d get rid of the “accessorizing” options like purse-shaped laptop totes, the flowery shells, and, oh, maybe, stop making shitty laptops!

Hat tip to Dan J.

Dudette, you’re getting a Della
{advertisement}

She might have been your evil overlord

I can’t bring myself to go to bed right now, am not feeling all that hot in various respects, so I’m hanging out on the computer until the Sinutab kicks in so at least I can breathe. Go read The Plan at Almost Diamonds, a thoroughly enjoyable short story about a woman and her “long game”. Also, say Happy Stephanie Zvan day to the owner and proprietor.

I just have to say, this story reminds me a lot of my original plans to become an English teacher, and how those got scuttled when I figured out I was pretty good at computers and could build a life out of my abilities. It also dovetails with my growing fascination with science and space, and how people keep telling me that I missed my calling. The best laid plans, and all that. (Do you see what I did there?)

I sense a sick day coming tomorrow. At least the stuff on my agenda could theoretically be done from home.

She might have been your evil overlord

So now we know RNA nucleotides can be spontaneously formed!

Good news everyone! </farnsworth>

For the last 20 years, scientists have been trying to puzzle out whether or not it was even possible for RNA to spontaneously self-arrange, thus sparking the beginnings of the chain reaction we call “life”, and have come up empty. One group of scientists decided to take every molecule involved in the creation of RNA nucleotydes and arrange them in different orders and expose them to different catalysts, and have just stumbled upon a way for ribocytidine phosphate to form naturally out of constituent chemicals, chemicals that we already know can be synthesized naturally in the pre-biotic environment Earth once had.

The building blocks of RNA, known as nucleotides, each consist of a chemical base, a sugar molecule called ribose and a phosphate group. Chemists quickly found plausible natural ways for each of these constituents to form from natural chemicals. But there was no natural way for them all to join together.

[…] Dr. Sutherland and his colleagues Matthew W. Powner and Béatrice Gerland report that they have taken the same starting chemicals used by others but have caused them to react in a different order and in different combinations than in previous experiments. they discovered their recipe, which is far from intuitive, after 10 years of working through every possible combination of starting chemicals.

Instead of making the starting chemicals form a sugar and a base, they mixed them in a different order, in which the chemicals naturally formed a compound that is half-sugar and half-base. When another half-sugar and half-base are added, the RNA nucleotide called ribocytidine phosphate emerges.

There’s no telling whether or not this is how those bits of pre-life actually arranged themselves to kick this whole life thing off, but the mere fact that it’s possible, suggests that, in the vast amount of time since the formation of the Earth and the vast amount of time during which the planet’s environment contained the chemicals necessary to arrange life in this manner, it may have been inevitable. Since we keep finding ways that certain links in the proposed chain of abiogenesis events *could* happen, and since we know that it *did* happen, then we know abiogenesis from no initial guiding force or intelligent spark is itself, as a theory, plausible! The chemicals necessary for life can be created and seeded onto planets from supernovas elsewhere in the galaxy, then life can, and under the right circumstances, *will* emerge from those seeds.

This heartens me, and it probably gives me the same sense of rapture that religious folks get by looking at the vastness of the universe and saying “goddidit”. It means that, as Carl Sagan once said, we are indeed “star stuff” — and we are indeed the universe’s way of knowing itself.

What I’d love to see turn up is new ways to arrange or spontaneously generate life that *didn’t* happen here, suggesting that there may be more than one self-sustaining chemical chain reaction that we could call “life” in this universe, possibly playing by vastly different rules and with vastly different constituent components (e.g., silicon!). Now that would be super-cool.

So now we know RNA nucleotides can be spontaneously formed!

Open mindedness

This is going viral lately through the rationalists/skeptics blogosphere for some reason, though I recall watching it a few months ago, probably from Pharyngula. Don’t recall if I posted it here or not (and not going to bother digging through the archive right now), so if I did, consider this a repost. It’s worth watching again.

I’m working (slowly) on a post about that link regarding RNA spontaneously self-arranging (which I re-tweeted from Richard Dawkins, over on my Twitter feed), but it’s not likely to be done tonight. I also have a special post scheduled to go up tomorrow, that I’ve already written.

Open mindedness

A whole lot of linking to Greg Laden for some reason

Here’s Greg’s most recent posts about Linux, because you all need to learn this stuff and how useful it is if you ever hope to be cooler than Grandma with her desktop icons and “start” button.

Concepts:
Cat – for outputting files’ contents and other such manipulation
Cups – the print spooler that, unlike in Windows, you can actually configure!
cut, sort, and other great tools for processing CSVs or text files
How closed-source software is like CHILD ABUSE (plus a real-life, really-happened, story about how Microsoft embarassed me at work!)
How to escalate privileges using su and sudo

He’s got a lot of other great newbie tutorials hidden in amongst the politics and flame wars, so go check it out. The Congo Memoirs are a great read, as well. (And yeah, I’m involved in that flame war now. And worse, I don’t think I’ll have the stamina to beat this asshole, either.)

A whole lot of linking to Greg Laden for some reason

Way to throw in with the Nazis, AGAIN, Loofah Boy.

“Who controls the past, controls the future.”
-George Orwell, 1984

Bill O’Reilly sides with Nazis and repeats their debunked propaganda in order to criticize Obama, and gets spanked by Keith Olbermann. How much longer are people going to watch Fox News? It’s sad that it’s the highest rated cable news channel, even now, after the GOP has all but collapsed into the black hole of suck left in Bush’s wake.

Way to throw in with the Nazis, AGAIN, Loofah Boy.

Church of the Flying Elephants

PZ Myers wrote a wonderful expansion of the old parable about blind men encountering an elephant. It begins:

Once upon a time, four blind men were walking in the forest, and they bumped into an elephant.

Moe was in front, and found himself holding the trunk. “It has a tentacle,” he said. “I think we have found a giant squid!”

Larry bumped into the side of the elephant. “It’s a wall,” he said, “A big, bristly wall.”

Curly, at the back, touched the tail. “It’s nothing to worry about, nothing but a piece of rope dangling in the trail.”

Eagletosh saw the interruption as an opportunity to sit in the shade beneath a tree and relax. “It is my considered opinion,” he said, “that whatever it is has feathers. Beautiful iridescent feathers of many hues.”

Go read the rest. It should hopefully enlighten you on how incorrect assumptions, stubbornness, and a lack of scientific curiosity, can dovetail and snowball into a religion, a meme that blinds people to the truth of the universe.

Church of the Flying Elephants

Wherein I explain how Oprah is quantifiably damaging humankind

If only he had joined a mainstream religion, like Oprahism or Voodoo.
Professor Farnsworth, Futurama

In a previous blog post, I made the assertion that Oprah Winfrey and her current fame is a net negative for society, and that’s not a charge I’m willing to make lightly. I’m going to start this post by describing a number of good deeds that Oprah has performed, because I am anything but an unfair critic. Bear in mind that I reserve the right to temper any praise for any individual point after the fact, because there’s at least one “charitable act” that I can think of, that was poorly thought out and ultimately a waste of money.

Get some popcorn, this is a long one.
Continue reading “Wherein I explain how Oprah is quantifiably damaging humankind”

Wherein I explain how Oprah is quantifiably damaging humankind