It’s been a busy weekend, much of it in support of Boobquake. First off, I’ve been listening to the calls to do more about Iran than mock the credulity of a cleric. That’s a taller order than you might think.
But what is to be done? What are the actual conditions in Iran, and what kind of leverage do we in the Western world, and particularly in the U.S. have to effect change?
Last summer, Stephanie Zvan was privileged to chat with Dr. William Beeman, professor of anthropology at the University of Minnesota and a leading Western scholar of Iran. They discussed the intersection of religion and politics in Iran, U.S.-Iranian relations, and the culture of Iran, including conditions for women. Some of what she learned surprised her. It may surprise you too.
It’s been a while since a new edition of Atheists Talk, but I think this one was worth waiting for. Go check it out.
I am also very proud to announce that I was invited to blog at Sex In The Public Square. I don’t know how often I’ll have anything to say that’s worth putting there, but I couldn’t resist a post after watching the backlash against Boobquake.
There was no sex in skepticism before the women showed up.
Forget Houdini’s brooding eyes and dark curls. Forget his personal magnetism. Those were strictly incidental. Forget the amount of skin–well-muscled skin–that he showed in his escapes. That was only to demonstrate he wasn’t hiding a key anywhere. Strictly utilitarian. Houdini’s appeal to his audience was based entirely on the complexity of his tricks and the calm reasoning he showed when dealing with mediums and spiritualists, and it’s a mere coincidence that many of the male faces of the skeptical movement since then have had similar stage experience and heaps of charisma.
I warn you, it gets sillier…and more serious. Please read it and check out more of Sex In The Public Square while you’re there.
And finally, I’ve been getting ready for the immodesty portion of Boobquake. I think I’m doing pretty well so far. Don’t you?